You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2014/01/17 16:59:17 UTC
apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?
We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical
functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.)
Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are the missing -DWINNT
define in the CMake-based build and the apr_dir_make_recursive() patch
posted yesterday (and more generally, testing that API better on Unix and
Windows).
What fixes are *you* interested in pushing along?
--- current changes ---
*) Fix apr_escape.c compilation errors on ebcdic platforms.
[Eric Covener]
*) FreeBSD 10: Correct a regression in 1.5.0 which affected non-
blocking sockets in some applications, including httpd. [Jeff
Trawick]
*) Windows cmake build: Fix incorrect installation of some .pdb
files. [Jeff Trawick]
*) apr_skiplist: Add compatibility with C++ applications.
[Jeff Trawick]
*) When using shmget-based shared memory, the ID used for ftok is
now an APR hash of the filename instead of the constant '1'.
PR 53996 [Jim Jagielski]
*) Correct a regression in 1.5.0 which affected out-of-tree
builds on Unix. [Rainer Jung]
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 18.01.2014 15:44, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Branko Čibej <brane@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a
> critical
> > functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.)
> >
> > Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are the missing
> > -DWINNT define in the CMake-based build and the
> > apr_dir_make_recursive() patch posted yesterday (and more generally,
> > testing that API better on Unix and Windows).
> >
> > What fixes are *you* interested in pushing along?
>
> I'm going to take a closer look at Bert's patch for
> apr_dir_make_recursive. What that actually means is that I'm going to
> replicate the fix to the other implementations and get the whole lot
> committed to trunk and ported to 1.5.x, because I already know his
> patch
> works on Windows.
>
>
> Cool!
This is now on trunk, 1.5.x and 1.4.x, with a new test case.
-- Brane
Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical
> > functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.)
> >
> > Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are the missing
> > -DWINNT define in the CMake-based build and the
> > apr_dir_make_recursive() patch posted yesterday (and more generally,
> > testing that API better on Unix and Windows).
> >
> > What fixes are *you* interested in pushing along?
>
> I'm going to take a closer look at Bert's patch for
> apr_dir_make_recursive. What that actually means is that I'm going to
> replicate the fix to the other implementations and get the whole lot
> committed to trunk and ported to 1.5.x, because I already know his patch
> works on Windows.
>
Cool!
>
> It would IMO be a valid fix for 1.4.x as well, if we want to ever deal
> with creating another 1.4 release.
>
Though there will probably never be another 1.4.x release, just backport
the fix if it is at all interesting to you instead of pondering the
imponderable.
>
> -- Brane
>
>
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: apr 1.5.x in a couple of weeks?
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 17.01.2014 16:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> We already have a couple of fixes for build regressions and a critical
> functional fix for the new FreeBSD release. (See below.)
>
> Others I'm interested in pushing along personally are the missing
> -DWINNT define in the CMake-based build and the
> apr_dir_make_recursive() patch posted yesterday (and more generally,
> testing that API better on Unix and Windows).
>
> What fixes are *you* interested in pushing along?
I'm going to take a closer look at Bert's patch for
apr_dir_make_recursive. What that actually means is that I'm going to
replicate the fix to the other implementations and get the whole lot
committed to trunk and ported to 1.5.x, because I already know his patch
works on Windows.
It would IMO be a valid fix for 1.4.x as well, if we want to ever deal
with creating another 1.4 release.
-- Brane