You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ambari.apache.org by "Dmitry Lysnichenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/03 12:28:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-20875) Removing A Service Causes DB Verification To Produce Warnings

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994761#comment-15994761 ] 

Dmitry Lysnichenko commented on AMBARI-20875:
---------------------------------------------

committed to trunk, waiting for 2.5.1 branchoff
To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari.git
   ff1de98..b061b1b  trunk -> trunk

> Removing A Service Causes DB Verification To Produce Warnings
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMBARI-20875
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20875
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.2
>            Reporter: Dmitry Lysnichenko
>            Assignee: Dmitry Lysnichenko
>             Fix For: 2.5.2
>
>         Attachments: AMBARI-20875.patch
>
>
> When removing a service, the configurations for that service are kept for historical purposes, but their various associations in the database are removed (specifically, the {{serviceconfigmapping}} relationships).
> After removing a service, the orphaned configurations now cause a warning to be displayed on Ambari Server startup:
> {noformat}
> 2017-04-06 17:15:24,003  WARN - You have config(s): ranger-storm-policymgr-ssl-version1467149286586,atlas-env-version1471883877194,falcon-env-version1467044148480,storm-site-version1467149286586,storm-site-version1474944944095,ranger-storm-plugin-properties-version1467149286586,hana_hadoop-env-version1476989318735,hana_hadoop-env-version1468951412523,hanaes-site-version1475773173499,hanaes-site-version1477639131416,atlas-env-version1471880496396,falcon-startup.properties-version1474944962583,ranger-storm-security-version1467149286586,falcon-env-version1474944962517,application-properties-version1471883877194,hanaes-site-version1468951412523,application-properties-version1471992143777,application-properties-version1471880496396,hana_hadoop-env-version1475790068354,hana_hadoop-env-version1477639131416,falcon-runtime.properties-version1467044148480,atlas-env-version1471992143777,hana_hadoop-env-version1475773173499,storm-env-version1467149286586,hanaes-site-version1475790068354,hanaes-site-version1476902714170,atlas-env-version1471883827584,hana_hadoop-env-version1477695406433,hanaes-site-version1476989583427,falcon-log4j-version1,falcon-env-version1474944962457,hanaes-site-version1468959251565,falcon-client.properties-version1,atlas-env-version1471993347065,falcon-startup.properties-version1467044148480,storm-cluster-log4j-version1467149286586,hanaes-site-version1472285532383,hana_hadoop-env-version1477695089738,hana_hadoop-env-version1468959251565,hana_hadoop-env-version1476989821279,atlas-log4j-version1,storm-site-version1467612840864,storm-worker-log4j-version1467149286586,ranger-storm-audit-version1467149286586,application-properties-version1471993347065,application-properties-version1471883827584,hana_hadoop-env-version1477695579450 that is(are) not mapped (in serviceconfigmapping table) to any service!
> {noformat}
> These orphaned configurations have entries in both {{clusterconfig}} and {{clusterconfigmapping}} but are otherwise not references anywhere. They don't hurt anything, but do trigger this warning since we can't determine if they _should_ have mappings in {{serviceconfigmapping}}.
> A few options:
> - When removing a service, remove configurations as well, leaving no orphans. Some would argue that this is a bad move since re-adding the service later would allow you to see the old configurations. I do not believe this is true since the old configurations are never associated with the new service's {{serviceconfig}} or {{serviceconfigmapping}}.
> - Make the warning smarter somehow to ignore these since it's expected they are orphaned.
> -- Somehow determine the service which should own the config and see if it exists in the cluster?
> -- Add a new column to {{clusterconfig}} to mark it as deleted?
> To clean these warnings, we had to:
> {code}
> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS orphaned_configs AS
> (SELECT
> cc.config_id,
> cc.type_name,
> cc.version_tag
> FROM clusterconfig cc, clusterconfigmapping ccm
> WHERE cc.config_id NOT IN (SELECT
> scm.config_id
> FROM serviceconfigmapping scm)
> AND cc.type_name != 'cluster-env'
> AND cc.type_name = ccm.type_name
> AND cc.version_tag = ccm.version_tag);
> DELETE FROM clusterconfigmapping
> WHERE EXISTS
> (SELECT 1 FROM orphaned_configs
> WHERE clusterconfigmapping.type_name = orphaned_configs.type_name AND clusterconfigmapping.version_tag = orphaned_configs.version_tag);
> DELETE FROM clusterconfig WHERE clusterconfig.config_id IN (SELECT config_id FROM orphaned_configs);
> SELECT * FROM orphaned_configs;
> DROP TABLE orphaned_configs;
> {code}
> I've considered advanced heuristics based on service metainfo with config dependencies, and service config mappings. But this approach may be unreliable when given inaccurate service metainfo between stack upgrades. Also, this approach is likely to delay server start on clusters with thousands of configs.
> So the solution Add a new column to clusterconfig to mark it as deleted. So warning will not be generated for such cluster configs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)