You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ignite TC Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/03/05 11:51:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-11152) IgniteTxManager.idMap possible
memory leak
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16784349#comment-16784349 ]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-11152:
----------------------------------------
{panel:title=--> Run :: All: No blockers found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=3231783&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
> IgniteTxManager.idMap possible memory leak
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-11152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11152
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mvcc
> Reporter: Stepachev Maksim
> Assignee: Roman Kondakov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: memory-leak, mvcc_stabilization_stage_1, transactions
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> CacheContinuousQueryAsyncFailoverMvccTxSelfTest.testMultiThreadedFailover sometimes finished with OMM.
> Heapdump analyze showed that leak happened in IgniteTxManager.idMap, this map contains *2_097_152* instances of GridNearTxLocal with *ACTIVE state* and *without* finishFut *and prepFut.*
>
> {code:java}
> while (!updated) {
> try {
> prevVal = (Integer)qryClnCache.getAndPut(key, val);
> updated = true;
> }
> catch (CacheException e) {
> assertSame(atomicityMode(), CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL_SNAPSHOT);
> }
> }
> {code}
>
>
> Possible the CacheException is common and may hide wrong cases. Change it at specific (ignite-10976).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)