[PING] Re: [VOTE] publish stdcxx 4.1.3, take 2

[Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>]

Justin, Bill & Ben:

Have you had a chance to check out the latest tarball? If so,
your vote would be greatly appreciated so that we can proceed
with the request to publish the tarball on general@incubator.

Thanks!
Martin

Martin Sebor wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>> Since several of them are involved and would require us to recertify
>>> the library on all the platforms where it has passed my goal is to get
>>> them fixed in 4.1.4. Does that sound reasonable?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure.  Let's just note that Mac OS X isn't supported in the release 
>> notes.
> 
> 
> Okay, this has been done:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=368452&view=rev
> 
> I also noticed a symbol versioning issue in gcc optimized builds
> on Solaris that causes unsats when linking. Since symbol versioning
> is still experimental I disabled it on the 4.1.3 branch:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=368485&view=rev
> 
> I created a new tarball incorporating these changes and replaced
> the old one with it. Here's the link again for convenience:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/stdcxx-incubating-4.1.3.tar.gz
> The md5sum for this file is f1bc9bd5ef0966f994a9183e7353176d.
> 
> Since these were the only changes I only smoke-tested this new tarball
> with gcc 3.2.3 on Linux and gcc 4.0.2 Solaris with successul results.
> I hereby cast my +1 vote to publish this tarball :)
> 
> I assume everyone else's votes are still good and that we just need
> a positive vote from you, Bill, or Ben before we can ask the Incubator
> PMC for permission to publish it.
> 
> Here's a tally of votes thus far:
> 
>   +1: 4 + 1 (johnh, lnicoara, ajindal, sebor + willson)
>    0: none
>   -1: none
> 
> Thanks
> Martin