You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Samuel Andrew McIntyre <fu...@nonintuitive.com> on 2004/12/01 18:27:17 UTC
[VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello derby-dev,
It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
that I have posted here:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
acceptable. While it may appear that they are already posted as a
release, due to a minor misunderstanding on my part, there still needs
to be a formal vote to accept them as a release here. If there are any
problems with the binaries that are posted, I will need to remove them.
If there are no problems and the vote passes, then I will leave them as
is and ask Jean to update the website to point to our first release.
:-)
And of course, my vote: +1
andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBrf8FDfB0XauCH7wRAp32AJ4zluQDMSzPcbVfPGS5z1Hn3ycXEwCfaXyy
XAsmL9vDwh1OzART2ecLqMU=
=VHAC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Suresh Thalamati <ts...@Source-Zone.org>.
+1 .
I think it might be helpful to add INSTALL file in the main directory
with getting started information
(http://incubator.apache.org/derby/manuals/getstart/gspr16.html.).
Saves a trip back to the download page :-)
-suresht
Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> Hello derby-dev,
>
> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
> that I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable. While it may appear that they are already posted as a
> release, due to a minor misunderstanding on my part, there still needs
> to be a formal vote to accept them as a release here. If there are any
> problems with the binaries that are posted, I will need to remove
> them. If there are no problems and the vote passes, then I will leave
> them as is and ask Jean to update the website to point to our first
> release. :-)
>
> And of course, my vote: +1
>
> andrew
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@Sourcery.Org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable.
+1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBtL7xG0h36bFmkocRAutFAJ4iHRwYknGVxJWfegKmaybwnOytdACeMEeu
4OYKbmKu3xoUEHrxuuVzQcc=
=xaaH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
+1
- -Brian
On Dec 1, 2004, at 12:27 PM, Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello derby-dev,
>
> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
> that I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable. While it may appear that they are already posted as a
> release, due to a minor misunderstanding on my part, there still needs
> to be a formal vote to accept them as a release here. If there are any
> problems with the binaries that are posted, I will need to remove
> them. If there are no problems and the vote passes, then I will leave
> them as is and ask Jean to update the website to point to our first
> release. :-)
>
> And of course, my vote: +1
>
> andrew
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFBrf8FDfB0XauCH7wRAp32AJ4zluQDMSzPcbVfPGS5z1Hn3ycXEwCfaXyy
> XAsmL9vDwh1OzART2ecLqMU=
> =VHAC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBs9fQaOuMdvjqKWcRAl++AJ0bM6V5ITQ1y1FPRNlX7K32ZMtyZACdEAlW
N/oYlbBaVI3DzShMHjbtBTk=
=LjC/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by myrnap <my...@Golux.Com>.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
>> that I have posted here:
>>
>> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>>
>> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
>> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
>> acceptable.
>
>
> Passed, total of eight +1 votes. Jean, could you please update the
> website with the news?
>
> I have also tagged 10.0.2.1 in subversion. Now that we have a release,
> and there are new features waiting to be checked in, I am planning on
> branching the 10.0 codeline and updating the version on the trunk to
> 10.1.0.0 alpha so that new features can be checked in as per our
> version/upgrade policy. I will send out a separate note about that
> shortly.
>
> andrew
>
I have no objection, but the dblook message problem should be documented
in a release notes entry (see derby 90).
Myrna
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Andrew McIntyre <fu...@nonintuitive.com>.
On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
> that I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable.
Passed, total of eight +1 votes. Jean, could you please update the
website with the news?
I have also tagged 10.0.2.1 in subversion. Now that we have a release,
and there are new features waiting to be checked in, I am planning on
branching the 10.0 codeline and updating the version on the trunk to
10.1.0.0 alpha so that new features can be checked in as per our
version/upgrade policy. I will send out a separate note about that
shortly.
andrew
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Samuel Andrew McIntyre <fu...@nonintuitive.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Andrew, what date/svn # is this release based on?
Since I needed to update STATUS and README for the Incubator, I also
updated the all the jars (and CHANGES, etc.) with jars built from
revision 106978.
andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBrgOVDfB0XauCH7wRAlD+AJ9GYuSeQiP4TTrrawLiHEmCPQWd3QCgoyTY
hYLFMsl/CWjTX7JivTqUY4E=
=9Fgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@Sourcery.Org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew, what date/svn # is this release based on?
Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> Hello derby-dev,
>
> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries that
> I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable. While it may appear that they are already posted as a
> release, due to a minor misunderstanding on my part, there still needs
> to be a formal vote to accept them as a release here. If there are any
> problems with the binaries that are posted, I will need to remove them.
> If there are no problems and the vote passes, then I will leave them as
> is and ask Jean to update the website to point to our first release. :-)
>
> And of course, my vote: +1
>
> andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBrgGSG0h36bFmkocRAvluAJ9LmdnotZy0tBY+U+vZAPp0awVFGwCeKN0n
hlbfGjptRT/bARxmvOw91rM=
=fkd0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
For reference, here's Andrew's call for a vote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=derby-dev@db.apache.org&msgNo=1116
I think I'm spotting an expectation in the DERBY-55 email thread (see
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=derby-dev@db.apache.org&msgNo=1158)
that the frameworks subdirectory will be included in the release. I
just downloaded and checked incubating-derby-10.0.2.1-bin.tar.gz, and it
does not include the frameworks directory.
-jean
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release - cts jdbc suite passed
Posted by myrnap <my...@Golux.Com>.
Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
> acceptable.
By the way - the 106978 build passed the jdbc suite of Sun's Complience
Test Suite
(cts version 141).
Also, the cts xa suite passed with derby as the database. (cts version
141 plus patch).
Myrna
Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Samuel Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> Hello derby-dev,
>
> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries that
> I have posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
+1
Dan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBrqOnIv0S4qsbfuQRAi6eAJ9u+/rk3Nx8EYCN1erPs0thq6q0jACfY80z
Y0wLqvH8GGzCeBUlsi7pIKg=
=jDDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----