[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2624) FO to RTF conversion adds unnecessary \cell after ... when it is nested inside any table cell

["Vinod Sankaranarayanan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16854656#comment-16854656 ] 

Vinod Sankaranarayanan commented on FOP-2624:
---------------------------------------------

[~cbowditch] - Will this bug get's prioritized anytime soon ?

> FO to RTF conversion adds unnecessary \cell after <fo:list-block>...</fo:list-block> when it is nested inside any table cell
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-2624
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2624
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: jaydeep V
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: FO.xml, HTML.html, RTF.rtf
>
>
> I am trying to convert from FO to RTF here, The version of FOP i am using is 1.1
> let say below is my FO
> ...
> ...
> <fo:table>
> <fo:table-body role="html:tbody">
> <fo:table-row role="html:tr">
> <fo:table-cell role="html:td">
> <fo:block>
> <fo:list-block  list-style-type="disc" role="html:ul">
> <fo:list-item role="html:li">
> <fo:list-item-label end-indent="label-end()">
> <fo:block><fo:inline >•</fo:inline></fo:block>
> </fo:list-item-label>
>  <fo:list-item-body start-indent="body-start()">
>  <fo:block>test data</fo:block>
> </fo:list-item-body>
>  </fo:list-item>
> ...(similarly many list items)..
> </fo:list-block>
> ..(some more fo:block div data)..
> </fo:table-cell>
> </fo:table-row>
> </fo:table-body>
> </fo:table>
> here immediately after the </fo:list-block> RTF is addind '\cell', Because of that even though there is some data after list block RTF treats it as end of table cell. 
> so Rest of the data after list block won't be visible in RTF.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)