You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@helix.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/01/23 23:44:55 UTC

[GitHub] [helix] pkuwm commented on a change in pull request #703: Created Helix distributed lock interface

pkuwm commented on a change in pull request #703: Created Helix distributed lock interface
URL: https://github.com/apache/helix/pull/703#discussion_r370413323
 
 

 ##########
 File path: helix-lock/src/main/java/org/apache/helix/lock/HelixLock.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+package org.apache.helix.lock;
+
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Generic interface for Helix distributed lock
+ */
+public interface HelixLock {
+  /**
+   * Acquire a lock
+   * @return true if the lock was acquired, false if could not be acquired
+   */
+  public boolean acquireLock();
 
 Review comment:
   - Do we want `public` modifier here because the interface is already `public`? I don't think it is necessary. All abstract, default, and static methods in an interface are implicitly public, so you can omit the public modifier.
   - Do we really need to return a boolean? I think it makes sense to return a boolean for a `tryAcquire`, but for `acquire`, I think void is enough and clean.
   - How about just naming `acquire`
   - Do we want a `tryAcquire` with timeout?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@helix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@helix.apache.org