You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Qingsheng Ren <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/27 08:40:40 UTC
[DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Hi devs,
I'd like to make a proposal of extending the feature freezing date of Flink
1.17 by two weeks, to January 31st, 2023.
With feedback release managers gathered these days and the ongoing
pandemic in China, one extra week would make it easier for developers to
finish their work. Also considering the Chinese New Year holiday from Jan
21st to Jan 27th, we think a two-week extension would be a better option,
which pushes the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
Any thoughts on this?
Best,
Qingsheng
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
+1 for extending the feature freeze date.
Best,
Jark
> 2023年1月3日 19:13，Xingbo Huang <hx...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> +1 for extending the freeze date to Jan 31st
>
> Best,
> Xingbo
>
> Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年1月3日周二 17:58写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:40 PM Matthias Pohl
>> <ma...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for extending to Jan 31
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:33 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the proposal (extending the 1.17 feature freeze date to Jan
>> 31st).
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Yu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:11, Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Zhu
>>>>>
>>>>> David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really
>> impacted
>>>>>>> development schedules.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jan 31st makes sense to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Leonard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Xingbo Huang <hx...@gmail.com>.
+1 for extending the freeze date to Jan 31st
Best,
Xingbo
Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 于2023年1月3日周二 17:58写道：
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:40 PM Matthias Pohl
> <ma...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for extending to Jan 31
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:33 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for the proposal (extending the 1.17 feature freeze date to Jan
> 31st).
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yu
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:11, Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Zhu
> > > >
> > > > David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really
> impacted
> > > > > > development schedules.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jan 31st makes sense to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Leonard
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:40 PM Matthias Pohl
<ma...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1 for extending to Jan 31
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:33 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the proposal (extending the 1.17 feature freeze date to Jan 31st).
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:11, Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zhu
> > >
> > > David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
> > > >
> > > > I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted
> > > > > development schedules.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jan 31st makes sense to me.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Leonard
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Matthias Pohl <ma...@aiven.io.INVALID>.
+1 for extending to Jan 31
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:33 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the proposal (extending the 1.17 feature freeze date to Jan 31st).
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:11, Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhu
> >
> > David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
> > >
> > > I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted
> > > > development schedules.
> > > >
> > > > Jan 31st makes sense to me.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Leonard
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the proposal (extending the 1.17 feature freeze date to Jan 31st).
Best Regards,
Yu
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:11, Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
> >
> > I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
> >
> > David
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted
> > > development schedules.
> > >
> > > Jan 31st makes sense to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Leonard
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com>.
+1 to extend the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
Thanks,
Zhu
David Anderson <da...@apache.org> 于2023年1月3日周二 11:41写道：
>
> I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted
> > development schedules.
> >
> > Jan 31st makes sense to me.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Leonard
> >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by David Anderson <da...@apache.org>.
I'm also in favor of extending the feature freeze to Jan 31st.
David
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 9:01 AM Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted
> development schedules.
>
> Jan 31st makes sense to me.
>
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Leonard Xu <xb...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Qingsheng for the proposal, the pandemic has really impacted development schedules.
Jan 31st makes sense to me.
Best,
Leonard
Re: [DISCUSS] Extending the feature freezing date of Flink 1.17
Posted by Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>.
Thanks QIngsheng,
+1 for extending the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
I'm aware of several feature developing threads that are struggling to
catch the deadline. Extending the freeze date would help avoid
halfly-cooked features and last-minute rushes. Moreover, I believe most of
the contributors from China won't be able to focus on the release testing
anyway until Jan 28th. Thus, the release is probably not postponed by the
extension of the feature freeze as much as it looks like.
Best,
Xintong
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 4:41 PM Qingsheng Ren <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to make a proposal of extending the feature freezing date of Flink
> 1.17 by two weeks, to January 31st, 2023.
>
> With feedback release managers gathered these days and the ongoing
> pandemic in China, one extra week would make it easier for developers to
> finish their work. Also considering the Chinese New Year holiday from Jan
> 21st to Jan 27th, we think a two-week extension would be a better option,
> which pushes the feature freeze date to Jan 31st.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Best,
> Qingsheng
>