You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/06 17:19:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2395) PersistentProvenanceRepository
Deadlocks caused by a blocked journal merge
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15552569#comment-15552569 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-2395:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 83fdced7c340ad25f78597be49c69d3b2fdbb8e3 in nifi's branch refs/heads/0.x from [~boardm26]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=83fdced ]
NIFI-2429 changes needed after cherry-picking NIFI-2395 from master
> PersistentProvenanceRepository Deadlocks caused by a blocked journal merge
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-2395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2395
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Framework
> Affects Versions: 0.6.0, 0.7.0
> Reporter: Brian Davis
> Assignee: Joseph Witt
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.0.0, 1.0.0-Beta
>
>
> I have a nifi instance that I have been running for about a week and has deadlocked at least 3 times during this time. When I say deadlock the whole nifi instance stops doing any progress on flowfiles. I looked at the stack trace and there are a lot of threads stuck doing tasks in the PersistentProvenanceRepository. Looking at the code I think this is what is happening:
> There is a ReadWriteLock that all the reads are waiting for a write. The write is in the loop:
> {code}
> while (journalFileCount > journalCountThreshold || repoSize > sizeThreshold) {
> // if a shutdown happens while we are in this loop, kill the rollover thread and break
> if (this.closed.get()) {
> if (future != null) {
> future.cancel(true);
> }
> break;
> }
> if (repoSize > sizeThreshold) {
> logger.debug("Provenance Repository has exceeded its size threshold; will trigger purging of oldest events");
> purgeOldEvents();
> journalFileCount = getJournalCount();
> repoSize = getSize(getLogFiles(), 0L);
> continue;
> } else {
> // if we are constrained by the number of journal files rather than the size of the repo,
> // then we will just sleep a bit because another thread is already actively merging the journals,
> // due to the runnable that we scheduled above
> try {
> Thread.sleep(100L);
> } catch (final InterruptedException ie) {
> }
> }
> logger.debug("Provenance Repository is still behind. Keeping flow slowed down "
> + "to accommodate. Currently, there are {} journal files ({} bytes) and "
> + "threshold for blocking is {} ({} bytes)", journalFileCount, repoSize, journalCountThreshold, sizeThreshold);
> journalFileCount = getJournalCount();
> repoSize = getSize(getLogFiles(), 0L);
> }
> logger.info("Provenance Repository has now caught up with rolling over journal files. Current number of "
> + "journal files to be rolled over is {}", journalFileCount);
> }
> {code}
> My nifi is at the sleep indefinitely. The reason my nifi cannot move forward is because of the thread doing the merge is stopped. The thread doing the merge is at:
> {code}
> accepted = eventQueue.offer(new Tuple<>(record, blockIndex), 10, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
> {code}
> so the queue is full.
> What I believe happened is that the callables created here:
> {code}
> final Callable<Object> callable = new Callable<Object>() {
> @Override
> public Object call() throws IOException {
> while (!eventQueue.isEmpty() || !finishedAdding.get()) {
> final Tuple<StandardProvenanceEventRecord, Integer> tuple;
> try {
> tuple = eventQueue.poll(10, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
> } catch (final InterruptedException ie) {
> continue;
> }
> if (tuple == null) {
> continue;
> }
> indexingAction.index(tuple.getKey(), indexWriter, tuple.getValue());
> }
> return null;
> }
> {code}
> finish before the offer adds its first event because I do not see any Index Provenance Events threads. My guess is the while loop condition is wrong and should be && instead of ||.
> I upped the thread count for the index creation from 1 to 3 to see if that helps. I can tell you if that helps later this week.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)