You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/18 13:00:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-2455) Speed up the merging of HostDb entries for variable fetch delay

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16330477#comment-16330477 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NUTCH-2455:
---------------------------------------

okedoki commented on issue #254: fix for NUTCH-2455 more efficient usage of hostdb in generate
URL: https://github.com/apache/nutch/pull/254#issuecomment-358639440
 
 
   @lewismc 
   Finally, I managed to solve the merging conflict.
   Please review before Generator will be modified again.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


> Speed up the merging of HostDb entries for variable fetch delay
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-2455
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2455
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: generator
>    Affects Versions: 1.13
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: NUTCH-2455.patch
>
>
> Citing Sebastian at NUTCH-2420:
> ??The correct solution would be to use <host,score> pairs as keys in the Selector job, with a partitioner and secondary sorting so that all keys with same host end up in the same call of the reducer. If values can also hold a HostDb entry and the sort comparator guarantees that the HostDb entry (entries if partitioned by domain or IP) comes in front of all CrawlDb entries. But that would be a substantial improvement...??



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)