You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> on 2009/03/21 17:31:41 UTC

VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Hi,
Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) has been staged and includes fixes for 61 issues.

The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
found here:
  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/continuum/1.3.2/

The site is staged here:
  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2
with release notes:

http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html


Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.

[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
The vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
--
Marica

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
+1

Emmanuel

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) has been staged and includes fixes for 61 issues.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/continuum/1.3.2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ectan/continuum/1.3.2/>
>
> The site is staged here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2<http://people.apache.org/%7Ectan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2>
> with release notes:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Ectan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html>
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
A belated +1 from me as well, though I wasn't able to test it thoroughly.

The signatures and checksums on the downloads are good, and a quick
test of adding/releasing projects and parallel builds on OS X worked
fine.

Thanks, Marica!  It will be great to have this out for the Friday
talks at ApacheCon. :)

-- 
Wendy

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote for Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) release has passed with the following
> tally:
>
> +1s
> 3 binding: Emmanuel, Marica, Olivier
> 1 non-binding: Jose
>
> No +0
> No -1
>
> I'll get this synced to central and publish the docs.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
The vote for Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) release has passed with the following
tally:

+1s
3 binding: Emmanuel, Marica, Olivier
1 non-binding: Jose

No +0
No -1

I'll get this synced to central and publish the docs.

Thanks,
--
Marica

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:

> Oups.
>
>  +1 Go on !!
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2009/3/24 Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > I'll extend the voting period since it seems like you guys need more time
> to
> > vote :)
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It's up to you as release manager, as long as you've got the votes.
> >> Sorry I confused the issue, I just read more into your statement than
> >> you intended.
> >>
> >> We don't really have guidelines, so I looked at the ones for Commons
> >> that someone pointed out on the Maven list recently:
> >> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
> >>
> >> Which says "While every effort should be made to ensure the quality of
> >> released code, "beta" releases are essentially provided as-is with no
> >> guarantees of stability or maintenance."  Works for me. :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Oh I thought it was a no big deal to have that kind of error for now
> :(
> >> > Anyway I can still cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release
> 1.3.3?
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never
> >> mind.
> >> >> :)
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Wendy
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Oups.

 +1 Go on !!

:-)

--
Olivier

2009/3/24 Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>:
> I'll extend the voting period since it seems like you guys need more time to
> vote :)
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's up to you as release manager, as long as you've got the votes.
>> Sorry I confused the issue, I just read more into your statement than
>> you intended.
>>
>> We don't really have guidelines, so I looked at the ones for Commons
>> that someone pointed out on the Maven list recently:
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
>>
>> Which says "While every effort should be made to ensure the quality of
>> released code, "beta" releases are essentially provided as-is with no
>> guarantees of stability or maintenance."  Works for me. :)
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Oh I thought it was a no big deal to have that kind of error for now :(
>> > Anyway I can still cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>> >>
>> >> Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never
>> mind.
>> >> :)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Wendy
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
I'll extend the voting period since it seems like you guys need more time to
vote :)

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's up to you as release manager, as long as you've got the votes.
> Sorry I confused the issue, I just read more into your statement than
> you intended.
>
> We don't really have guidelines, so I looked at the ones for Commons
> that someone pointed out on the Maven list recently:
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html
>
> Which says "While every effort should be made to ensure the quality of
> released code, "beta" releases are essentially provided as-is with no
> guarantees of stability or maintenance."  Works for me. :)
>
> --
> Wendy
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Oh I thought it was a no big deal to have that kind of error for now :(
> > Anyway I can still cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
> >>
> >> Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never
> mind.
> >> :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
It's up to you as release manager, as long as you've got the votes.
Sorry I confused the issue, I just read more into your statement than
you intended.

We don't really have guidelines, so I looked at the ones for Commons
that someone pointed out on the Maven list recently:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html

Which says "While every effort should be made to ensure the quality of
released code, "beta" releases are essentially provided as-is with no
guarantees of stability or maintenance."  Works for me. :)

-- 
Wendy

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh I thought it was a no big deal to have that kind of error for now :(
> Anyway I can still cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>>
>> Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never mind.
>> :)
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Oh I thought it was a no big deal to have that kind of error for now :(
Anyway I can still cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>
> Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never mind.
> :)
>
> --
> Wendy
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?

Oh, I thought you might from the way the message was worded.  Never mind. :)

-- 
Wendy

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Btw, here's my +1

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Verified and tested the ff:
> - signatures and checksums
> - was able to start using derby
> - build and release  in a non-distributed build
> - build and release in a distributed build
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure
>>> field in
>>> > ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(
>>>
>>> Thanks for catching that!  I probably wouldn't have tested ith MySQL.
>>> No big deal, just try again with 1.3.3. :)
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
Verified and tested the ff:
- signatures and checksums
- was able to start using derby
- build and release  in a non-distributed build
- build and release in a distributed build


On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure field
>> in
>> > ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(
>>
>> Thanks for catching that!  I probably wouldn't have tested ith MySQL.
>> No big deal, just try again with 1.3.3. :)
>>
>
> What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure field
> in
> > ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(
>
> Thanks for catching that!  I probably wouldn't have tested ith MySQL.
> No big deal, just try again with 1.3.3. :)
>

What do you mean try again with 1.3.3? Cancel 1.3.2 and release 1.3.3?


>
> --
> Wendy
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure field in
> ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(

Thanks for catching that!  I probably wouldn't have tested ith MySQL.
No big deal, just try again with 1.3.3. :)

-- 
Wendy

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
This is the correct error:
2009-03-22 08:22:25,924 [WrapperSimpleAppMain] ERROR JPOX.RDBMS  - Error
thrown executing CREATE TABLE `PROJECTNOTIFIER`
(
    `ID` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `ENABLED` BIT NOT NULL,
    `NOTIFIERORIGIN` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `MODEL_ENCODING` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
    `RECIPIENT_TYPE` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_ERROR` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'false',
    `SEND_ON_SUCCESS` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_WARNING` BIT NOT NULL,
    `NOTIFIERTYPE` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=INNODB : Invalid default value for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Invalid default value
for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'


On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure field in
> ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(
> 2009-03-22 08:22:25,924 [WrapperSimpleAppMain] ERROR JPOX.RDBMS  - Error
> thrown executing CREATE TABLE `PROJECTNOTIFIER`
> (
>     `ID` INTEGER NOT NULL,
>     `ENABLED` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `NOTIFIERORIGIN` INTEGER NOT NULL,
>     `MODEL_ENCODING` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
>     `RECIPIENT_TYPE` INTEGER NOT NULL,
>     `SEND_ON_ERROR` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `SEND_ON_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `SEND_ON_SUCCESS` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `SEND_ON_WARNING` BIT NOT NULL,
>     `NOTIFIERTYPE` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
>     PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
> ) ENGINE=INNODB : Invalid default value for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'
> com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Invalid default value
> for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'
>
>
> 2009/3/22 José Morales Martínez <jm...@gmv.com>
>
> +1
>>
>> -----------------------
>> Jose
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marica Tan [mailto:marica.tan@gmail.com]
>> Sent: sáb 21/03/2009 17:31
>> To: dev@continuum.apache.org
>> Subject: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)
>>
>> Hi,
>> Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) has been staged and includes fixes for 61 issues.
>>
>> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
>> found here:
>>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/continuum/1.3.2/
>>
>> The site is staged here:
>>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2
>> with release notes:
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html
>>
>>
>> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release it!
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Marica
>>
>>
>> ______________________
>> Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
>>  puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial
>>  en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la
>> Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando
>> prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la
>> autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje
>>  erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su borrado.
>> Gracias por su colaboracion.
>> ______________________
>> This message including any attachments may contain confidential
>> information, according to our Information Security Management System,
>>  and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed.
>>  Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message
>>  is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error,
>>  please notify the sender immediately and delete it.
>> ______________________
>>
>
>

Re: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by Marica Tan <ma...@gmail.com>.
I failed to remove jpox.null-value="default" from sendOnScmFailure field in
ProjectNotifier, which prevents from using 1.3.2 with mysql :(
2009-03-22 08:22:25,924 [WrapperSimpleAppMain] ERROR JPOX.RDBMS  - Error
thrown executing CREATE TABLE `PROJECTNOTIFIER`
(
    `ID` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `ENABLED` BIT NOT NULL,
    `NOTIFIERORIGIN` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `MODEL_ENCODING` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
    `RECIPIENT_TYPE` INTEGER NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_ERROR` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_SUCCESS` BIT NOT NULL,
    `SEND_ON_WARNING` BIT NOT NULL,
    `NOTIFIERTYPE` VARCHAR(255) BINARY NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=INNODB : Invalid default value for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Invalid default value
for 'SEND_ON_SCM_FAILURE'


2009/3/22 José Morales Martínez <jm...@gmv.com>

> +1
>
> -----------------------
> Jose
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marica Tan [mailto:marica.tan@gmail.com]
> Sent: sáb 21/03/2009 17:31
> To: dev@continuum.apache.org
> Subject: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)
>
> Hi,
> Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) has been staged and includes fixes for 61 issues.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/continuum/1.3.2/
>
> The site is staged here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2
> with release notes:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html
>
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Marica
>
>
> ______________________
> Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
>  puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial
>  en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la
> Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando
> prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la
> autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje
>  erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su borrado.
> Gracias por su colaboracion.
> ______________________
> This message including any attachments may contain confidential
> information, according to our Information Security Management System,
>  and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed.
>  Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message
>  is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error,
>  please notify the sender immediately and delete it.
> ______________________
>

RE: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Posted by José Morales Martínez <jm...@gmv.com>.
+1

-----------------------
Jose



-----Original Message-----
From: Marica Tan [mailto:marica.tan@gmail.com]
Sent: sáb 21/03/2009 17:31
To: dev@continuum.apache.org
Subject: VOTE] Release Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta)

Hi,
Continuum 1.3.2 (Beta) has been staged and includes fixes for 61 issues.

The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
found here:
  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/continuum/1.3.2/

The site is staged here:
  http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2
with release notes:

http://people.apache.org/~ctan/staging-sites/continuum/1.3.2/release-notes.html


Everyone is encouraged to vote and give their feedback.

[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Don't release it, because..
The vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
--
Marica


______________________
Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo,
 puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial
 en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la 
Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando 
prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la 
autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje 
 erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su borrado. 
Gracias por su colaboracion.
______________________
This message including any attachments may contain confidential 
information, according to our Information Security Management System,
 and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed.
 Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message
 is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error,
 please notify the sender immediately and delete it.
______________________