You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com> on 2011/10/24 13:25:46 UTC
Does plan creator only support WARs?
Hi Devs,
When I use the "Plan Creator" in web console, and configure an empty file,
an error msg will display "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs
are supported as of now".
However, I configure an very simple EAR(with an dynamic web and an EJB),
actually, it works! However the plan 's format is not correct and with such
an error: "2011-10-24 19:17:36,158 WARN [BaseCallMarshaller] --Erroring:
batchId[3] message[java.lang.NullPointerException]" .
If we really only supports the WARs, I think we should check the archive's
type before creating the plan, not let the error happen after.
Any suggestions?
--
Best regards!
John Xiao
Re: Does plan creator only support WARs?
Posted by Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I think so. Thanks, Ivan[?]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that that JIRA is only for extracting those messages from the
> codes, those logic for throwing exception should be in previous changes.
>
>
> 2011/10/25 Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks for your suggestions, Shawn!
>> I find the jira Geronimo-4484<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4484> add
>> the info. The patch's intention is "extract all the hard coded messages from
>> the portlets to resource bundle and work on a unified way to display these
>> messages in admin console".
>> I still try to find why we only support WARs' plan creator.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest you search "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs
>>> are supported as of now" in the commit history to see who checked in that
>>> message.
>>>
>>> The commit log might help you to understand the background.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are supported as of now
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards!
>>
>>
>> John Xiao
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Best regards!
John Xiao
Re: Does plan creator only support WARs?
Posted by Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>.
Finally, I am sure the plan creator just create the plan for WARs as the EJB
module has been ignored~
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that that JIRA is only for extracting those messages from the
> codes, those logic for throwing exception should be in previous changes.
>
>
> 2011/10/25 Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks for your suggestions, Shawn!
>> I find the jira Geronimo-4484<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4484> add
>> the info. The patch's intention is "extract all the hard coded messages from
>> the portlets to resource bundle and work on a unified way to display these
>> messages in admin console".
>> I still try to find why we only support WARs' plan creator.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest you search "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs
>>> are supported as of now" in the commit history to see who checked in that
>>> message.
>>>
>>> The commit log might help you to understand the background.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are supported as of now
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards!
>>
>>
>> John Xiao
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Best regards!
John Xiao
Re: Does plan creator only support WARs?
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
I think that that JIRA is only for extracting those messages from the codes,
those logic for throwing exception should be in previous changes.
2011/10/25 Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>
> Thanks for your suggestions, Shawn!
> I find the jira Geronimo-4484<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4484> add
> the info. The patch's intention is "extract all the hard coded messages from
> the portlets to resource bundle and work on a unified way to display these
> messages in admin console".
> I still try to find why we only support WARs' plan creator.
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I suggest you search "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are
>> supported as of now" in the commit history to see who checked in that
>> message.
>>
>> The commit log might help you to understand the background.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are supported as of now
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards!
>
>
> John Xiao
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: Does plan creator only support WARs?
Posted by Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your suggestions, Shawn!
I find the jira
Geronimo-4484<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4484> add
the info. The patch's intention is "extract all the hard coded messages from
the portlets to resource bundle and work on a unified way to display these
messages in admin console".
I still try to find why we only support WARs' plan creator.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suggest you search "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are
> supported as of now" in the commit history to see who checked in that
> message.
>
> The commit log might help you to understand the background.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are supported as of now
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
--
Best regards!
John Xiao
Re: Does plan creator only support WARs?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
I suggest you search "The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are
supported as of now" in the commit history to see who checked in that
message.
The commit log might help you to understand the background.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Yi Xiao <xi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The archive you provided is not a WAR. Only WARs are supported as of now
--
Shawn