You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@groovy.apache.org by Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> on 2018/06/26 09:21:56 UTC

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3

The vote has passed with four +1 PMC votes and one additional +1 vote.

I'll proceed with next steps.

Cheers, Paul.

On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:15 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:

>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3 release!
> This version is intended to be released at the same time as Groovy
> 2.6.0-alpha-4
> and is the recommended next version of Groovy for users of JDK8 and above.
>
> This release includes 40 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the
> changelog:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12343061
>
> Tag:
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_0_ALPHA_3
> Tag commit id: f29fde1781c79c14ec6deb21bbf91913bc220c9f
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r27681).
> Source release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.0-alpha-3/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.0-alpha-3/distribution
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with
> sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.0-alpha-3 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>