You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> on 2010/08/30 15:56:38 UTC
shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Hi,
I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to this
commit
http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html ?
Thanks!
Han
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com>.
k, thank you.
From: ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra <ja...@google.com>
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Date: 08/30/2010 02:35 PM
Subject: Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Yes. json-simple.jar is used by Caja.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
wrote:
> If you execute "mvn dependency:tree" you can find out where the deps
come
> from. In this case it's caja:
>
> [INFO] +- org.apache.shindig:shindig-gadgets:jar:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] | +- caja:caja:jar:r4251:compile
> [INFO] | | +- com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple:jar:1.1:compile
> [INFO] | | \- xerces:xmlParserAPIs:jar:2.6.2:compile
> [INFO] | +- caja:htmlparser:jar:r4209:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-httpclient4:jar:20090913:compile
> [INFO] | | \- net.oauth.core:oauth-consumer:jar:20090617:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-provider:jar:20100527:compile
> [INFO] | +- rome:rome:jar:1.0:compile
> [INFO] | | \- jdom:jdom:jar:1.0:compile
> [INFO] | +- rome:modules:jar:0.3.2:compile
> [INFO] | +- com.ibm.icu:icu4j:jar:3.8:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.sourceforge.nekohtml:nekohtml:jar:1.9.14:compile
> [INFO] | +- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] | +- org.apache.sanselan:sanselan:jar:0.97-incubator:compile
> [INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.0.1:compile
> [INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:jar:4.0.1:compile
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > ok, would you mind remove it pls? thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gagandeep singh <ga...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@shindig.apache.org
> > Date: 08/30/2010 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
> >
> >
> >
> > I remember adding json-simple back by mistake when i was debugging
some
> > issues. Turned out my client was not synced correctly.
> > I think its okay to remove it.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according
to
> > > this
> > > > commit
> > > >
http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html?
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Han
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by ๏̯͡๏ Jasvir Nagra <ja...@google.com>.
Yes. json-simple.jar is used by Caja.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> If you execute "mvn dependency:tree" you can find out where the deps come
> from. In this case it's caja:
>
> [INFO] +- org.apache.shindig:shindig-gadgets:jar:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
> [INFO] | +- caja:caja:jar:r4251:compile
> [INFO] | | +- com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple:jar:1.1:compile
> [INFO] | | \- xerces:xmlParserAPIs:jar:2.6.2:compile
> [INFO] | +- caja:htmlparser:jar:r4209:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-httpclient4:jar:20090913:compile
> [INFO] | | \- net.oauth.core:oauth-consumer:jar:20090617:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-provider:jar:20100527:compile
> [INFO] | +- rome:rome:jar:1.0:compile
> [INFO] | | \- jdom:jdom:jar:1.0:compile
> [INFO] | +- rome:modules:jar:0.3.2:compile
> [INFO] | +- com.ibm.icu:icu4j:jar:3.8:compile
> [INFO] | +- net.sourceforge.nekohtml:nekohtml:jar:1.9.14:compile
> [INFO] | +- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.9.1:compile
> [INFO] | +- org.apache.sanselan:sanselan:jar:0.97-incubator:compile
> [INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.0.1:compile
> [INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:jar:4.0.1:compile
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > ok, would you mind remove it pls? thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gagandeep singh <ga...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@shindig.apache.org
> > Date: 08/30/2010 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
> >
> >
> >
> > I remember adding json-simple back by mistake when i was debugging some
> > issues. Turned out my client was not synced correctly.
> > I think its okay to remove it.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to
> > > this
> > > > commit
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html?
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Han
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>.
If you execute "mvn dependency:tree" you can find out where the deps come
from. In this case it's caja:
[INFO] +- org.apache.shindig:shindig-gadgets:jar:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] | +- caja:caja:jar:r4251:compile
[INFO] | | +- com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple:jar:1.1:compile
[INFO] | | \- xerces:xmlParserAPIs:jar:2.6.2:compile
[INFO] | +- caja:htmlparser:jar:r4209:compile
[INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-httpclient4:jar:20090913:compile
[INFO] | | \- net.oauth.core:oauth-consumer:jar:20090617:compile
[INFO] | +- net.oauth.core:oauth-provider:jar:20100527:compile
[INFO] | +- rome:rome:jar:1.0:compile
[INFO] | | \- jdom:jdom:jar:1.0:compile
[INFO] | +- rome:modules:jar:0.3.2:compile
[INFO] | +- com.ibm.icu:icu4j:jar:3.8:compile
[INFO] | +- net.sourceforge.nekohtml:nekohtml:jar:1.9.14:compile
[INFO] | +- xerces:xercesImpl:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.sanselan:sanselan:jar:0.97-incubator:compile
[INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.0.1:compile
[INFO] | \- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:jar:4.0.1:compile
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ok, would you mind remove it pls? thank you!
>
>
>
> From: Gagandeep singh <ga...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@shindig.apache.org
> Date: 08/30/2010 11:22 AM
> Subject: Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
>
>
>
> I remember adding json-simple back by mistake when i was debugging some
> issues. Turned out my client was not synced correctly.
> I think its okay to remove it.
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> wrote:
>
> > is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to
> > this
> > > commit
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html ?
> > > Thanks!
> > > Han
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
> >
>
>
--
Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com>.
ok, would you mind remove it pls? thank you!
From: Gagandeep singh <ga...@gmail.com>
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Date: 08/30/2010 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
I remember adding json-simple back by mistake when i was debugging some
issues. Turned out my client was not synced correctly.
I think its okay to remove it.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
wrote:
> is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to
> this
> > commit
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html ?
> > Thanks!
> > Han
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by Gagandeep singh <ga...@gmail.com>.
I remember adding json-simple back by mistake when i was debugging some
issues. Turned out my client was not synced correctly.
I think its okay to remove it.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to
> this
> > commit
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html ?
> > Thanks!
> > Han
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>
Re: shouldn't json-simple jar be removed from shindig?
Posted by Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>.
is it a transitive dependency perhaps?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm seeing json-simple jar in trunk, shouldn't it be out according to this
> commit
> http://www.mail-archive.com/commits@shindig.apache.org/msg00439.html ?
> Thanks!
> Han
--
Paul Lindner -- plindner@linkedin.com -- linkedin.com/in/plindner