You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Christian Geisert <ch...@isu-gmbh.de> on 2005/11/12 14:19:05 UTC

docs dir

Hi,

Seems Manuel just had the same thought ...

The docs dir contains old stuff that isn't needed anymore (maybe except 
xml2pdf.xsl which could be moved to a new examples/xslt dir)

So, has anybody objections if I remove the docs dir?

Christian

Re: docs dir

Posted by Andreas L Delmelle <a_...@pandora.be>.

On Nov 12, 2005, at 14:20, Manuel Mall wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:19 pm, Christian Geisert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seems Manuel just had the same thought ...
>>
>> The docs dir contains old stuff that isn't needed anymore (maybe
>> except xml2pdf.xsl which could be moved to a new examples/xslt dir)
>>
>> So, has anybody objections if I remove the docs dir?
>>
>
> Fine with me.

Same here. Go right ahead.


Cheers,

Andreas

Re: docs dir

Posted by Manuel Mall <mm...@arcus.com.au>.

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:19 pm, Christian Geisert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems Manuel just had the same thought ...
>
> The docs dir contains old stuff that isn't needed anymore (maybe
> except xml2pdf.xsl which could be moved to a new examples/xslt dir)
>
> So, has anybody objections if I remove the docs dir?
>

Fine with me.

> Christian

Re: docs dir

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@jeremias-maerki.ch>.

No objections. xml2pdf.xsl is the only thing worth saving but only if
somebody updates xslfoRef.xml to Recommendation level at some point. I'd
move the two files to examples/fo/fo-reference so it doesn't get lost in
the depths of SVN history.

On 12.11.2005 14:19:05 Christian Geisert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Seems Manuel just had the same thought ...
> 
> The docs dir contains old stuff that isn't needed anymore (maybe except 
> xml2pdf.xsl which could be moved to a new examples/xslt dir)
> 
> So, has anybody objections if I remove the docs dir?
> 
> Christian

Jeremias Maerki