Changes in trunk

[Michael Bauroth <Mi...@falcom.de>]

Hi,

I've updated currently the MINA sources. Unfortunately like in older 
versions I have everytime the big problem, that classes disappear, 
default behaviour changes and so on. For the future I think it would be 
a good idea to present such changes on a central place on the Wiki page.
What do you mean?

I know, that 99% of the stuff were be written and discussed in the 
mailing list. But unfortunately I haven't already the time to read each 
entry there. Sorry.

I would very appreciated, if someone could help me with a few hints on 
my current problems for now:



question 1)

mConnector = new SocketConnector();
mConfig = new SocketConnectorConfig();
mConfig.setConnectTimeout( 600 );
((SocketSessionConfig )( mConfig.getSessionConfig() )).setReuseAddress( 
false );

SocketConnectorConfig seems to be gone. Does the following code do the same?

mConnector = new SocketConnector();
mConnector.setConnectTimeout( 600 );
mConfig = mConnector.getSessionConfig();
((SocketSessionConfig )( mConnector.getSessionConfig() 
)).setReuseAddress( false );


question 2)

is mAcceptor.getManagedServiceAddresses() the same as 
mAcceptor.getLocalAddress()?


question 3)

is tConfig.getFilterChain() replaced by mAcceptor.getFilterChain()?


question 4)

which is the best advice for a correct managed threadmodel with maximum 
throughput (dual core)? I 've read something in the mailinglist about 
some changes here from previous automatically adjusted pool vs. manual 
at the moment? If you could support a small snippet of code, it would be 
very useful for me.

Thanx in advance again.

Best Regards
Michael

Re: Changes in trunk

[Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>]

Answering 1 & 3.
Yes. the connectorConfig has been removed as it, as I saw, held
references to the config classes which the acceptor now does itself.

2. Hopefully someone with more mina usage than I do can answer that
but at first glance I'm not so sure it is the same.

4. Here it depends on your app. I don't think there is a clear set of
guidelines for optimising mina yet. Perhaps we should start a wiki
page to bring everyones experience together.

Hope that helps a bit.

On 21/11/06, Michael Bauroth <Mi...@falcom.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've updated currently the MINA sources. Unfortunately like in older
> versions I have everytime the big problem, that classes disappear,
> default behaviour changes and so on. For the future I think it would be
> a good idea to present such changes on a central place on the Wiki page.
> What do you mean?
>
> I know, that 99% of the stuff were be written and discussed in the
> mailing list. But unfortunately I haven't already the time to read each
> entry there. Sorry.
>
> I would very appreciated, if someone could help me with a few hints on
> my current problems for now:
>
>
>
> question 1)
>
> mConnector = new SocketConnector();
> mConfig = new SocketConnectorConfig();
> mConfig.setConnectTimeout( 600 );
> ((SocketSessionConfig )( mConfig.getSessionConfig() )).setReuseAddress(
> false );
>
> SocketConnectorConfig seems to be gone. Does the following code do the same?
>
> mConnector = new SocketConnector();
> mConnector.setConnectTimeout( 600 );
> mConfig = mConnector.getSessionConfig();
> ((SocketSessionConfig )( mConnector.getSessionConfig()
> )).setReuseAddress( false );
>
>
> question 2)
>
> is mAcceptor.getManagedServiceAddresses() the same as
> mAcceptor.getLocalAddress()?
>
>
> question 3)
>
> is tConfig.getFilterChain() replaced by mAcceptor.getFilterChain()?
>
>
> question 4)
>
> which is the best advice for a correct managed threadmodel with maximum
> throughput (dual core)? I 've read something in the mailinglist about
> some changes here from previous automatically adjusted pool vs. manual
> at the moment? If you could support a small snippet of code, it would be
> very useful for me.
>
> Thanx in advance again.
>
> Best Regards
> Michael
>


-- 
Martin Ritchie