You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2004/08/03 01:03:23 UTC
cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet WsdlToDotnet.java
stevel 2004/08/02 16:03:23
Modified: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Log:
wsdl.exe cant spell parseable.
Revision Changes Path
1.24 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/WsdlToDotnet.java
Index: WsdlToDotnet.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/WsdlToDotnet.java,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- WsdlToDotnet.java 2 Aug 2004 22:42:20 -0000 1.23
+++ WsdlToDotnet.java 2 Aug 2004 23:03:22 -0000 1.24
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
command.addArgument("/protocol:"+protocol);
}
if(parseableErrors) {
- command.addArgument("/parseableErrors");
+ command.addArgument("/parsableErrors");
}
command.addArgument(extraOptions);
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit:
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> do we need a <mono> task that execs things; runs them direct on
> windows, but relays through mono if you ask?
Please take a look at proposals/sandbox/dotnet and in particular the
dotnetexec task 8-)
Any helping hand is welcome.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>Actually, the file:// protocol turns out to be best of all for
>>Windows,
>
>
> And not only there, it would be the cleanest solution in either case.
this is now an option.
>
>>So maybe we should add a way to run that. This leads to a choice of
>>runtimes of more than just net/mono but
>>
>>ms
>>mono
>>ms-on-mono
>>
>>which looks like the beginnings of an enum to me.
>
>
> Absolutely. I've always considered my isMono flags a hack that
> completely falls down as soon as you want to use Rotor or DotGNU or
> whatever. That's why I introduced a more flexible approach in the
> dotnet sandbox area.
I've just patched dotnet.
do we need a <mono> task that execs things; runs them direct on windows,
but relays through mono if you ask?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit:
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>2. I wonder if we could fix that mono relative file problem by
>>>turning all file refs into file: URLs?
>> Unfortunately we can't - I've already tried that. Mono's wsdl.exe
>> doesn't seem to recognize file:// as protocoll.
>
> yeah, just filed a bug on that.
Great.
> Actually, the file:// protocol turns out to be best of all for
> Windows,
And not only there, it would be the cleanest solution in either case.
> I am thinking that when isMono==false, we turn the file reference
> not into an absolute reference, but a file: URL.
Fine with me, we may even be able to drop the isMono guard later.
> So maybe we should add a way to run that. This leads to a choice of
> runtimes of more than just net/mono but
>
> ms
> mono
> ms-on-mono
>
> which looks like the beginnings of an enum to me.
Absolutely. I've always considered my isMono flags a hack that
completely falls down as soon as you want to use Rotor or DotGNU or
whatever. That's why I introduced a more flexible approach in the
dotnet sandbox area.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>>>On 2 Aug 2004, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> wsdl.exe cant spell parseable.
>>>
>>>Ouch.
>>>What are you going to do when the next SDK beta fixes the error?
>>
>>I dont think they will fix it, I think they believe it is correct :)
>
>
> Hmm, OK. I don't want to start another spel(l)ing discussion.
well, there are some MS people wanting to talk to the axis team
regarding interop issues. I will bring up spelling of parseable as one
of our show stoppers :)
>
>
>>We could change the name of the tag in our task so it doesnt use the
>>same keyword;
>
>
> probably best since people would be confused otherwise.
>
>
>>ps, 1. I have mono on the box
>
>
> Linux or Win?
linux. suse 9.1pro.
>
>
>>2. I wonder if we could fix that mono relative file problem by
>>turning all file refs into file: URLs?
>
>
> Unfortunately we can't - I've already tried that. Mono's wsdl.exe
> doesn't seem to recognize file:// as protocoll.
>
yeah, just filed a bug on that.
Actually, the file:// protocol turns out to be best of all for Windows,
because then it correctly resolves relative references for importation.
Given that all the <schema> stuff I added yesterday was to do that, if I
send a file:// reference to the compiler, there was no need to do it.
(cant have been for mono, can it :)
I am thinking that when isMono==false, we turn the file reference not
into an absolute reference, but a file: URL.
whatever, because I am using includes, mono's wsdl cannot generate the
code I need. There are hints, however, that if I run "mono wsdl.exe "
with the MS version of wsdl, all is well (other WsdL bugs on mono
bugzilla). So maybe we should add a way to run that. This leads to a
choice of runtimes of more than just net/mono but
ms
mono
ms-on-mono
which looks like the beginnings of an enum to me.
-steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit:
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2 Aug 2004, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> wsdl.exe cant spell parseable.
>> Ouch.
>> What are you going to do when the next SDK beta fixes the error?
>
> I dont think they will fix it, I think they believe it is correct :)
Hmm, OK. I don't want to start another spel(l)ing discussion.
> We could change the name of the tag in our task so it doesnt use the
> same keyword;
probably best since people would be confused otherwise.
> ps, 1. I have mono on the box
Linux or Win?
> 2. I wonder if we could fix that mono relative file problem by
> turning all file refs into file: URLs?
Unfortunately we can't - I've already tried that. Mono's wsdl.exe
doesn't seem to recognize file:// as protocoll.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2004, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>> wsdl.exe cant spell parseable.
>
>
> Ouch.
>
> What are you going to do when the next SDK beta fixes the error?
I dont think they will fix it, I think they believe it is correct :)
if you google for both spellings, parsable and parseable, parseable wins
out over parsable by 4 to 1, but parsable is still common. The Oxford
dictionary says parseable, the US dictionary I have to hand doesn't list
it.
We could change the name of the tag in our task so it doesnt use the
same keyword; that could prevent us amplifying the confusion.
-Steve
ps,
1. I have mono on the box
2. I wonder if we could fix that mono relative file problem by turning
all file refs into file: URLs?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: cvs commit:
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet
WsdlToDotnet.java
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2 Aug 2004, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> wsdl.exe cant spell parseable.
Ouch.
What are you going to do when the next SDK beta fixes the error?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org