You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Udovichenko, Nellya" <ne...@intel.com> on 2006/09/06 17:11:38 UTC
RE: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Hello, Matt!
I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1
I expected.
Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3
(see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday).
Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be
available in TranQL 1.4?
Nellya.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org <ma...@hogstrom.org> ]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Vasily,
It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of
Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can
get this in 1.1.1.
Matt
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
>
> What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the
> transaction isolation level in TranQL?
>
> I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a
> successful SPECjAppServer2004 run...
>
> Recently you said
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html <http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html> )
> that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a
> part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>
>
Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
I was planning on some changes to TranQL for CMP support but didn't get them completed on time. I
thought it would be unfair to hold up the release because of my delinquency so I regressed to 1.3.
The changes should be in 1.1.2 or 1.2.
Udovichenko, Nellya wrote:
> Hello, Matt!
>
>
>
> I have downloaded Geronimo-1.1.1-rc2 and see TranQL version is 1.3 there instead of 1.3.1
>
> I expected.
>
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote that's due to there haven't been any changes to TranQL since 1.3
>
> (see topic "TranQL version in Geronimo-1.1.1-rc1" yesterday).
>
>
>
> Does it mean the support for transaction isolation level setting would only be
>
> available in TranQL 1.4?
>
>
>
> Nellya.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:matt@hogstrom.org <ma...@hogstrom.org> ]
>
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:41 PM
>
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>
> Subject: Re: Transaction isolation level in TranQL
>
>
>
> Vasily,
>
>
>
> It is already part of TranQL. What we need is a change to OpenEJB to allow the specification of
>
> Isolation Level so TranQL can generate the right code. Let me start a new thread to see if we can
>
> get this in 1.1.1.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi, Matt,
>
>
>> What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the
>
>> transaction isolation level in TranQL?
>
>
>> I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a
>
>> successful SPECjAppServer2004 run...
>
>
>> Recently you said
>
>> (http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html <http://www.mail-archive.com/user@geronimo.apache.org/msg03421.html> )
>
>> that this feature may be a part of TranQL 1.3.1, which is gonna be a
>
>> part of Geronimo 1.1.1, as far as I understand. Am I right?
>
>
>> Thank you!
>
>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>
>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>
>
>
>
>
>