You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/16 21:09:41 UTC

[io] readying release?

Hi All:

I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?

Gary

-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Benedikt Ritter <br...@apache.org>.
I agree. I think it is vital that people have the feeling that something is
happening (without following the Dev ML). This works best by pushing out
releases frequently.


2013/4/21 Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>

> My view is that we do not have to fix or address everything in each
> release that is outstanding. In my mind its important to keep the
> release trains moving.
>
> Gary
>
> On Apr 21, 2013, at 0:45, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Because they're low hanging fruit:
> >
> > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299
> > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328
> > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
> >
> > Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All:
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think the following need resolving:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356
> >>
> >> Possibly some others
> >>
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> >>> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
+1 :)

Regular cadence is huge.


On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>wrote:

> My view is that we do not have to fix or address everything in each
> release that is outstanding. In my mind its important to keep the
> release trains moving.
>
> Gary
>
> On Apr 21, 2013, at 0:45, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Because they're low hanging fruit:
> >
> > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299
> > Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328
> > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
> >
> > Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All:
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think the following need resolving:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356
> >>
> >> Possibly some others
> >>
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> >>> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
My view is that we do not have to fix or address everything in each
release that is outstanding. In my mind its important to keep the
release trains moving.

Gary

On Apr 21, 2013, at 0:45, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because they're low hanging fruit:
>
> Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299
> Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328
> Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
>
> Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> I think the following need resolving:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356
>>
>> Possibly some others
>>
>>
>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
>>> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:33 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 April 2013 03:41, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I did wonder about using Reflection to solve the issue for Java 7.
> > >
> > > Should we still use the command shell for Java 6?
> > >
> > >
> > Doesn't seem necessary - those who want the feature on Windows can move
> to
> > Java 7.
>
>
> In which case why bother with the work round, when the user can just call
> the Java 7 method directly?
>
> I'm inclined to resolve as won't fix.
>

I was thinking that it moves our current users to Java 7's version without
making them change their code. That said - there will probably be bugs in
the mapping and it's simpler to have them change code, so I'm happy with
won't fix.

Hen

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 22 April 2013 03:41, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
> > >
> > >
> > I did wonder about using Reflection to solve the issue for Java 7.
> >
> > Should we still use the command shell for Java 6?
> >
> >
> Doesn't seem necessary - those who want the feature on Windows can move to
> Java 7.


In which case why bother with the work round, when the user can just call
the Java 7 method directly?

I'm inclined to resolve as won't fix.

Seems a bit late to go writing code we could have written 10 years
> ago to support the last year or two of usefulness before Java 7 is
> everywhere :)
>
> Hen
>

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:27 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
> >
> >
> I did wonder about using Reflection to solve the issue for Java 7.
>
> Should we still use the command shell for Java 6?
>
>
Doesn't seem necessary - those who want the feature on Windows can move to
Java 7. Seems a bit late to go writing code we could have written 10 years
ago to support the last year or two of usefulness before Java 7 is
everywhere :)

Hen

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 21 April 2013 05:44, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because they're low hanging fruit:
>
> Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299
> Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328
>

I can do those; partly I was waiting for some feedback, which I now have.


> Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295
>
>
I did wonder about using Reflection to solve the issue for Java 7.

Should we still use the command shell for Java 6?


> Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > I think the following need resolving:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356
> >
> > Possibly some others
> >
> >
> > Gary
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> >
>

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Because they're low hanging fruit:

Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-299
Javadoc: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-328
Proposed fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-295

Agreed on IO-356. Not sure how critical IO-350 is :)



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:15 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
> >
>
> I think the following need resolving:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356
>
> Possibly some others
>
>
> Gary
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>

Re: [io] readying release?

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 16 April 2013 20:09, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> I'm thinking of a release sooner rather than later. Thoughts?
>

I think the following need resolving:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-356

Possibly some others


Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>