You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Gyula Fora (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/11/16 15:50:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-29959) Use optimistic locking when patching resource status
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-29959.
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.3.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main 99dc38f1270ae9b13a8b461df8a0bf66e9d8b5f7
> Use optimistic locking when patching resource status
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-29959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29959
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Kubernetes Operator
> Reporter: Gyula Fora
> Assignee: Gyula Fora
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: kubernetes-operator-1.3.0
>
>
> The operator currently does not use optimistic locking on the CR when patching status. This worked because we always wanted to overwrite the status.
> With leader election and potentially two operators running at the same time, we are now exposed to some race conditions that were not previously present with the status update logic.
> To ensure that the operator always sees the latest status we should change our logic to optimistic locking with retries. If we get a lock error (resource updated) we check if only the spec changed and then retry locking on the new version.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)