[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-595) Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency

["Christopher Tubbs (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17472221#comment-17472221 ] 

Christopher Tubbs commented on LEGAL-595:
-----------------------------------------

This is effectively a duplicate of LEGAL-594

> Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-595
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-595
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Priority: Major
>
> In ZOOKEEPER-4427, Apache ZooKeeper is considering adoption of Logback for logging infrastructure. Logback is dual-licensed under LGPL (category X/disallowed) and EPL (category B/allowable) [1].
> Does ZooKeeper need to do something specific to indicate that it chooses to adopt the terms of EPL, and not LGPL? Do we need particular phrasing in the ZooKeeper NOTICE.txt [2] to record our choice of EPL?
> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
> [2] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/master/zookeeper-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE.txt



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org