You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@camel.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/10/07 13:14:57 UTC

[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez commented on issue #3725: Default `operator.id` annotation

squakez commented on issue #3725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3725#issuecomment-1271578299

   Interesting. Then there must be some bug because I installed 2 operators in separate namespace (`development` and `production`) none is global. Later I'm running an Integration without `operator.id` annotation in both namespaces and both operators are reconciling the Integration correctly in each of their namespaces. Notice that I'm very happy to have this behavior, reason why I was wondering why we need to explicitly include the annotation when we want to default it to the namespace on which we install the Integration. Also, this behavior simplify the `promote` subcommand across namespaces.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org