You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lenya.apache.org by Andreas Hartmann <an...@apache.org> on 2004/05/04 09:48:22 UTC

[Fwd: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]

Here's a mail from Derek Hohls to cocoon-users:

<snip>
How are we doing in comparison to our peers - see:
http://www.hibernate.org/38.html

Think about how Cocoon is doing on these points which
are, I think, valid for pretty much any OS project -
but even more so as the scope gets wider, new features
are added and the community grows in both size and
range (from newbies to veterans, with a bias towards the
former...)

Derek
</snip>

Looking at the points on the linked page, I have to
admit that Lenya could do better in some of them :)

 > rapid release schedule

     Massive potential for improvement.

 > regression tests

     The same. But I think this is quite difficult
     in a web-based application.

 > do one thing well

     This has been discussed quite frequently and
     there are different opinions in the community ...

 > avoid over-design

     I think we score quite high at this.

 > a central vision

 > documentation

     This one has strongly improved during the last
     months, thanks to all the external contributors.

 > avoid standardsism

 > up and running in ten minutes or less!

     This has also improved.

 > developer responsiveness

     "24 hours is a good target for the average response
     time between a bug report and the CVS fix."

     This sounds impracticable, doesn't it?

 > easily update-able wiki pages.....

     We have them.

-- Andreas



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org


Re: [Fwd: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]

Posted by Michael Wechner <mi...@wyona.com>.
Andreas Hartmann wrote:

>
> Looking at the points on the linked page, I have to
> admit that Lenya could do better in some of them :)
>
> > rapid release schedule
>
>     Massive potential for improvement.


agreed. For a start let's do another RC: 1.2rc4

>
> > regression tests
>
>     The same. But I think this is quite difficult
>     in a web-based application.


I still think we should make better use of webtests

>
> > do one thing well
>
>     This has been discussed quite frequently and
>     there are different opinions in the community ...


I think actually we agree on doing one thing, but not what
the one thing is ;-)

>
>
> > documentation
>
>     This one has strongly improved during the last
>     months, thanks to all the external contributors.


but we still need to get better and especially update the actual website
more often

>
> > up and running in ten minutes or less!
>
>     This has also improved.


it has, but we still have to improve a lot.


Maybe during the sprint/hackathon we should address some of the topics
above.

Michi

> -- Andreas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Michael Wechner
Wyona Inc.  -   Open Source Content Management   -   Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com              http://cocoon.apache.org/lenya/
michael.wechner@wyona.com                        michi@apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org


Gump (Re: Why ${this.Project} is successful?])

Posted by Andreas Kuckartz <A....@ping.de>.
I just found this:
http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/cocoon-lenya/cocoon-lenya/index.html

Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Kuckartz" <A....@ping.de>
To: "Lenya Developers List" <le...@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]


> Some of these points are closely related.
>
> A "rapid release schedule" to "to keep the project bug-free" very much depends
> on automatic "regression tests". Using Gump would be an important step. (See
> http://gump.cocoondev.org/ and http://gump.apache.org/). But to do that a
> cocoonified build-process would help - and that would perhaps also help with
"up
> and running in ten minutes or less".
>
> Andreas
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Hartmann" <an...@apache.org>
> To: <le...@cocoon.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 9:48 AM
> Subject: [Fwd: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]
>
>
> > Here's a mail from Derek Hohls to cocoon-users:
> >
> > <snip>
> > How are we doing in comparison to our peers - see:
> > http://www.hibernate.org/38.html
> >
> > Think about how Cocoon is doing on these points which
> > are, I think, valid for pretty much any OS project -
> > but even more so as the scope gets wider, new features
> > are added and the community grows in both size and
> > range (from newbies to veterans, with a bias towards the
> > former...)
> >
> > Derek
> > </snip>
> >
> > Looking at the points on the linked page, I have to
> > admit that Lenya could do better in some of them :)
> >
> >  > rapid release schedule
> >
> >      Massive potential for improvement.
> >
> >  > regression tests
> >
> >      The same. But I think this is quite difficult
> >      in a web-based application.
> >
> >  > do one thing well
> >
> >      This has been discussed quite frequently and
> >      there are different opinions in the community ...
> >
> >  > avoid over-design
> >
> >      I think we score quite high at this.
> >
> >  > a central vision
> >
> >  > documentation
> >
> >      This one has strongly improved during the last
> >      months, thanks to all the external contributors.
> >
> >  > avoid standardsism
> >
> >  > up and running in ten minutes or less!
> >
> >      This has also improved.
> >
> >  > developer responsiveness
> >
> >      "24 hours is a good target for the average response
> >      time between a bug report and the CVS fix."
> >
> >      This sounds impracticable, doesn't it?
> >
> >  > easily update-able wiki pages.....
> >
> >      We have them.
> >
> > -- Andreas
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org


Re: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]

Posted by Andreas Kuckartz <A....@ping.de>.
Some of these points are closely related.

A "rapid release schedule" to "to keep the project bug-free" very much depends
on automatic "regression tests". Using Gump would be an important step. (See
http://gump.cocoondev.org/ and http://gump.apache.org/). But to do that a
cocoonified build-process would help - and that would perhaps also help with "up
and running in ten minutes or less".

Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Hartmann" <an...@apache.org>
To: <le...@cocoon.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Why ${this.Project} is successful?]


> Here's a mail from Derek Hohls to cocoon-users:
>
> <snip>
> How are we doing in comparison to our peers - see:
> http://www.hibernate.org/38.html
>
> Think about how Cocoon is doing on these points which
> are, I think, valid for pretty much any OS project -
> but even more so as the scope gets wider, new features
> are added and the community grows in both size and
> range (from newbies to veterans, with a bias towards the
> former...)
>
> Derek
> </snip>
>
> Looking at the points on the linked page, I have to
> admit that Lenya could do better in some of them :)
>
>  > rapid release schedule
>
>      Massive potential for improvement.
>
>  > regression tests
>
>      The same. But I think this is quite difficult
>      in a web-based application.
>
>  > do one thing well
>
>      This has been discussed quite frequently and
>      there are different opinions in the community ...
>
>  > avoid over-design
>
>      I think we score quite high at this.
>
>  > a central vision
>
>  > documentation
>
>      This one has strongly improved during the last
>      months, thanks to all the external contributors.
>
>  > avoid standardsism
>
>  > up and running in ten minutes or less!
>
>      This has also improved.
>
>  > developer responsiveness
>
>      "24 hours is a good target for the average response
>      time between a bug report and the CVS fix."
>
>      This sounds impracticable, doesn't it?
>
>  > easily update-able wiki pages.....
>
>      We have them.
>
> -- Andreas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lenya-dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lenya-dev-help@cocoon.apache.org