[axis2] ws-addr test cases

[Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>]

FYI. We should make sure we pass these!

Sanjiva.

Re: [axis2] ws-addr test cases

[Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>]

Glen Daniels wrote:
> Hey Steve:
> 
>>  > Ooops wrong link:
>>  >     http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/
>>
>> It still offends me that WS-A can consider themselves nearly ready to 
>> be final and yet they only have a few draft test cases. For example, 
>> where is their wsa:To header with a ? string in
>>
>> <wsa:To>http://ex.org/url?name=vale</wsa:To>
> 
> 
> ("we" below means WS-A)
> 
> 1) We are in the process of building a test suite and then we'll get to 
> the testing.  It's not that we think the test suite is done, it's that 
> we're only now entering the phase where we concentrate primarily on that.

that means you are following a process of
1. -define 'normative' standard
2. get standard standardised
3. write test cases

but at the same time as (3), people are writing their implementations. 
And without test cases, they all interpret the spec differently.

> 
> 2) Please do submit test cases!  We would really appreciate it.

I dont have test cases, but I know that at the gridforum event in boston 
last week, of the four deployment api implementations 
(http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/deployment/deployment/doc/api/ggf-cddlm-deploy-api.pdf), 
all using WS-A under WS-RF, we could only demonstrate interop between 
the two axis1.x/muse implementations, because the others (.NET1.1/WSE 
and Axis2) all had different expectations of WS-A.

> 3) What's special about the test above?  I agree if you get such a URL 
> in a <ReplyTo> you need to echo it faithfully, but is there anything 
> else you see that case testing?

The aim is to test that the ? string doesnt get stripped on a post.

Re: [axis2] ws-addr test cases

[Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>]

Hey Steve:

>  > Ooops wrong link:
>  >     http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/
> 
> It still offends me that WS-A can consider themselves nearly ready to be 
> final and yet they only have a few draft test cases. For example, where 
> is their wsa:To header with a ? string in
> 
> <wsa:To>http://ex.org/url?name=vale</wsa:To>

("we" below means WS-A)

1) We are in the process of building a test suite and then we'll get to 
the testing.  It's not that we think the test suite is done, it's that 
we're only now entering the phase where we concentrate primarily on that.

2) Please do submit test cases!  We would really appreciate it.

3) What's special about the test above?  I agree if you get such a URL 
in a <ReplyTo> you need to echo it faithfully, but is there anything 
else you see that case testing?

--Glen

Re: [axis2] ws-addr test cases

[Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>]

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
 > Ooops wrong link:
 > 	http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/
 >
 > Sanjiva.
 >

It still offends me that WS-A can consider themselves nearly ready to be 
final and yet they only have a few draft test cases. For example, where 
is their wsa:To header with a ? string in

<wsa:To>http://ex.org/url?name=vale</wsa:To>

Re: [axis2] ws-addr test cases

[Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>]

Ooops wrong link:
	http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/

Sanjiva.

On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 10:37 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> FYI. We should make sure we pass these!
> 
> Sanjiva.
> email message attachment, "Forwarded message - RE: Comments on CR test
> cases"
> On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 10:37 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> > 
> > > Maybe the testcases document could include a copy
> > > of the example messages.. i'll have a think ..
> > 
> > There's now an index page for the test documents:
> > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/documents/
> > 
> > Paul
> >