You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "Andrzej A. Filip" <an...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/16 17:54:47 UTC
Re: Reporting to SpamCop [wish: option to use port 25 instead of
default 587]
On 11/16/2013 01:34 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>
>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>> alternate?
>
> It appears to be hard-coded to use the submission port.
IMHO It may be a good idea to provide configuration option to use port
25 instead of default port 587.
Re: Reporting to SpamCop [wish: option to use port 25 instead of
default 587]
Posted by Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi>.
16.11.2013 18:54, Andrzej A. Filip kirjoitti:
> On 11/16/2013 01:34 PM, RW wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>>
>>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>>> alternate?
>> It appears to be hard-coded to use the submission port.
> IMHO It may be a good idea to provide configuration option to use port
> 25 instead of default port 587.
>
Why? Most ISP's filter port 25 for spam if not outright reject it if it
was not their own server.
Well, of course option is always an option, but I do not see that an
especially practical option.
--
jarif.bit