Re: Confirmed but unidentified memory leak in RC2

[Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vi...@praxis.it>]

Noel J. Bergman wrote:

>>if you are using the BayesianAnalysis mailet, keep in mind that the
>>in-memory corpus may slowly grow a little bit, checked mail after
>>checked mail. It is done on purpose to reduce the number of computations
>>of "degenerated tokens"
>>    
>>
>
>Should we look at using references to hold the in-memory corpus as a cache,
>and recreate if necessary?
>
>  
>
Good idea, but I would cache only a new corpus HashMap containing only 
the "dynamic" tokens, as the main corpus itself is used all the time and 
is heavy to load, while the dynamic tokens can be built very fast and 
their  "usefulness"  is  mostly  for  the  current  message. And because 
of that, I would use a weak instead of a soft reference to such corpus.

I'll do it for 2.4 :-) .

Vincenzo

 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org