You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by "Michael Maguire (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/04/12 20:15:49 UTC
[jira] Created: (COUCHDB-733) INSTALL.Windows wording suggests it's
OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
INSTALL.Windows wording suggests it's OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: COUCHDB-733
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-733
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Question
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 0.11
Environment: Windows 7 with cygwin
Reporter: Michael Maguire
Priority: Minor
The file:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/INSTALL.Windows
states:
47 You must check that:
48
49 * The `which link` command points to the Microsoft linker.
50
51 * The `which cl` command points to the Microsoft compiler.
52
53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` may be used instead.
This makes it sound as though which link and which cl *should* be the Microsoft ones, but it's permissible to use the /usr/bin ones.
Is that the intent?
If not, can I suggest this says something more like:
53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` would be used instead, which won't work properly.
P.S.: I'm asking because I'm attempting to get the build going, and even though I've done vcvars32.bat and 'which cl' is pointing to the Microsoft one, 'which link' is still pointing to '/usr/bin/link' and I need to know if that's cool or not.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-733) INSTALL.Windows wording suggests it's
OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
Posted by "Paul Joseph Davis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Paul Joseph Davis updated COUCHDB-733:
--------------------------------------
Skill Level: New Contributors Level (Easy)
> INSTALL.Windows wording suggests it's OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-733
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Question
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 0.11
> Environment: Windows 7 with cygwin
> Reporter: Michael Maguire
> Priority: Minor
>
> The file:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/INSTALL.Windows
> states:
> 47 You must check that:
> 48
> 49 * The `which link` command points to the Microsoft linker.
> 50
> 51 * The `which cl` command points to the Microsoft compiler.
> 52
> 53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` may be used instead.
> This makes it sound as though which link and which cl *should* be the Microsoft ones, but it's permissible to use the /usr/bin ones.
> Is that the intent?
> If not, can I suggest this says something more like:
> 53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` would be used instead, which won't work properly.
> P.S.: I'm asking because I'm attempting to get the build going, and even though I've done vcvars32.bat and 'which cl' is pointing to the Microsoft one, 'which link' is still pointing to '/usr/bin/link' and I need to know if that's cool or not.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-733) INSTALL.Windows wording suggests
it's OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
Posted by "Mark Hammond (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856267#action_12856267 ]
Mark Hammond commented on COUCHDB-733:
--------------------------------------
Yes - you are correct in that things will not work correct with /usr/bin/link - I'll apply your patch soon...
> INSTALL.Windows wording suggests it's OK for cygwin to use /usr/bin/link. Is this intentional?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-733
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Question
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 0.11
> Environment: Windows 7 with cygwin
> Reporter: Michael Maguire
> Priority: Minor
>
> The file:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/INSTALL.Windows
> states:
> 47 You must check that:
> 48
> 49 * The `which link` command points to the Microsoft linker.
> 50
> 51 * The `which cl` command points to the Microsoft compiler.
> 52
> 53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` may be used instead.
> This makes it sound as though which link and which cl *should* be the Microsoft ones, but it's permissible to use the /usr/bin ones.
> Is that the intent?
> If not, can I suggest this says something more like:
> 53 If you do not do this, the ones found in `/usr/bin` would be used instead, which won't work properly.
> P.S.: I'm asking because I'm attempting to get the build going, and even though I've done vcvars32.bat and 'which cl' is pointing to the Microsoft one, 'which link' is still pointing to '/usr/bin/link' and I need to know if that's cool or not.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira