You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by James Peach <jp...@apache.org> on 2017/07/11 11:13:11 UTC
Review Request 60764: Refactor isolator dependency checking.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for mesos, Qian Zhang and Jiang Yan Xu.
Bugs: MESOS-7675
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7675
Repository: mesos
Description
-------
Refactor the isolator dependency checks to immediately tokenize the
isolator string, which makes it easier to check various consistency
conditions.
Diffs
-----
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 9376d14d66f5dc7e91c7c0e9da253f5eb9347539
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/1/
Testing
-------
make check (Fedora 26)
Thanks,
James Peach
Re: Review Request 60764: Refactored isolator dependency checking.
Posted by James Peach <jp...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Aug. 22, 2017, 8:28 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Qian Zhang and Jiang Yan Xu.
Bugs: MESOS-7675
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7675
Repository: mesos
Description
-------
Refactored the isolator dependency checks to immediately tokenize
the isolator string, which makes it easier to check various consistency
conditions.
Diffs (updated)
-----
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 5772421c3078d36225b946a5286b8c1bf2f007e8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/8/
Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/7-8/
Testing
-------
make check (Fedora 26)
Thanks,
James Peach
Re: Review Request 60764: Refactored isolator dependency checking.
Posted by James Peach <jp...@apache.org>.
> On Aug. 22, 2017, 3:32 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
> > Line 154 (original), 169 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/7/?file=1796964#file1796964line169>
> >
> > Can you create a LinkedHashset (similar to LinkedHashmap) in stout which preserve the insertion order. this solves one issues about the ordering of the isolators is not preserved.
> >
> > I would at least add a TODO here (i do wish you can follow up :))
Added a TODO referring to [MESOS-7643](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7643)
- James
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#review183435
-----------------------------------------------------------
On July 11, 2017, 11:13 a.m., James Peach wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 11, 2017, 11:13 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Qian Zhang and Jiang Yan Xu.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-7675
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7675
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Refactored the isolator dependency checks to immediately tokenize
> the isolator string, which makes it easier to check various consistency
> conditions.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp ff192bb085f3554ad1b1f20fb73bf827bf04ef13
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/7/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check (Fedora 26)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Peach
>
>
Re: Review Request 60764: Refactored isolator dependency checking.
Posted by Jie Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#review183435
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fix it, then Ship it!
Thanks for the cleanup!
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 148 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment259440>
Let's just inline this method. There is only one user for this method.
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Line 154 (original), 169 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment259441>
Can you create a LinkedHashset (similar to LinkedHashmap) in stout which preserve the insertion order. this solves one issues about the ordering of the isolators is not preserved.
I would at least add a TODO here (i do wish you can follow up :))
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 182-184 (original), 203-208 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment259442>
The indentation should be like the following:
```
switch (std::count_if(
isolations->begin(),
isolations->end(),
[](...) {
})) {
}
```
similar to what we did for other statements:
```
int foo = func(
param1,
param2);
```
- Jie Yu
On July 11, 2017, 11:13 a.m., James Peach wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 11, 2017, 11:13 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Qian Zhang and Jiang Yan Xu.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-7675
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7675
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Refactored the isolator dependency checks to immediately tokenize
> the isolator string, which makes it easier to check various consistency
> conditions.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp ff192bb085f3554ad1b1f20fb73bf827bf04ef13
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/7/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check (Fedora 26)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Peach
>
>
Re: Review Request 60764: Refactor isolator dependency checking.
Posted by Qian Zhang <zh...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#review180388
-----------------------------------------------------------
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 151 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255534>
No need `std::`
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Line 155 (original), 170 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255535>
Kill this empty line.
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Line 181 (original), 203 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255541>
Not yours. A period in the end.
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 182-192 (original), 204-221 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255545>
Can we merge the logic of these two `if` blocks? I mean:
1. Get the count by calling `std::count_if()`.
2. If the count > 1, error out.
3. Else if the count == 0, do the insert.
In this way, we do not need to call `strings::contains()` anymore.
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 238 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255543>
Ditto
src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp
Lines 207-210 (original), 238-250 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/#comment255546>
Ditto.
- Qian Zhang
On July 11, 2017, 7:13 p.m., James Peach wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 11, 2017, 7:13 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Qian Zhang and Jiang Yan Xu.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-7675
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7675
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Refactor the isolator dependency checks to immediately tokenize the
> isolator string, which makes it easier to check various consistency
> conditions.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 9376d14d66f5dc7e91c7c0e9da253f5eb9347539
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60764/diff/1/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> make check (Fedora 26)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Peach
>
>