You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shawn Heisey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/14 20:24:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12352) Solr mod function query does not
yield correct results
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474752#comment-16474752 ]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-12352:
-------------------------------------
Problem confirmed on 6.6.2-SNAPSHOT and 7.3.0. Added the following parameter to a query:
{noformat}
fl=*,foo:mod(1600463487761383425,1526324140364)
{noformat}
That added the following to each document in the result (wt=json:
{noformat}
"foo":1.28043752E12
{noformat}
I found it irritating that I got exponential notation (and the associated loss of precision) instead of a true number, but as the issue indicates, the value is completely wrong. The correct value of 1204927482853 was confirmed both in a test Java program and with the scientific calculator built into Windows 7.
> Solr mod function query does not yield correct results
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12352
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: gnandre
> Priority: Minor
>
> It seems mod operation in function query is not working correctly for large numbers.
> "_version_": 1600463487761383425,
> "ms(NOW)": 1526324140364,
> "mod(_version_,ms(NOW))": 1280437520000
>
> However, mod(1600463487761383425,1526324140364) is 1204927482853.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org