You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> on 2008/11/28 23:28:18 UTC
trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Hi all,
Currently I see a lot of activity in the apacheds-mina2 branch. I
planned to improve the javadoc of the partition related interfaces. Does
it make sense to do this on trunk? Or should I do that in
apacheds-mina2? Is there any schedule for a merge?
Thanks in advance,
Stefan
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Excellent - thanks for the update.
Alex
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> What's the timeframe on this merge?
>>
>>
> Hi Alex,
>
> if we exclude the 72 hours for a vote on MINA 2.0.0-M4, we currently have 7
> issues for this version, 3 of them being bugs. One affects the statemachine,
> and as we received no answer from the guy who wrote this part, I think we
> can differ its resolution (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-604), another one is about
> the TraficClass usage (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539)
> : totally useless IMHO, and the last one is a bit more annoying, but we may
> have a way to workaround it (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-632).
>
> If we postpone the 4 other issues, which are not really important, then we
> can have a version by monday.
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> What's the timeframe on this merge?
>
Hi Alex,
if we exclude the 72 hours for a vote on MINA 2.0.0-M4, we currently
have 7 issues for this version, 3 of them being bugs. One affects the
statemachine, and as we received no answer from the guy who wrote this
part, I think we can differ its resolution
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-604), another one is
about the TraficClass usage
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-539) : totally useless
IMHO, and the last one is a bit more annoying, but we may have a way to
workaround it (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-632).
If we postpone the 4 other issues, which are not really important, then
we can have a version by monday.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Hi guys,
What's the timeframe on this merge?
Thanks,
Alex
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de> wrote:
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> There are two branches, apacheds-mina2 and ads-mina2.0. I guess one of
>>> them is obsolete. Shouldn't we remove it?
>>>
>> No, in fact, both are necessary. The ads-mina2.0 branch is equivalent to
>> apacheds-with-dependencies. The other one (apacheds-mina2) is the apacheds
>> sub-project.
>>
>> I should have named the first branch ads-mina2-with-dependencies, making
>> things crystal clear...
>>
>
> Thanks for clarification, Emmanuel
>
>
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de>.
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> There are two branches, apacheds-mina2 and ads-mina2.0. I guess one of
>> them is obsolete. Shouldn't we remove it?
> No, in fact, both are necessary. The ads-mina2.0 branch is equivalent to
> apacheds-with-dependencies. The other one (apacheds-mina2) is the
> apacheds sub-project.
>
> I should have named the first branch ads-mina2-with-dependencies, making
> things crystal clear...
Thanks for clarification, Emmanuel
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Stefan Zoerner wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>> Well, I was expecting MINA 2.0.0-M4 to be released earlier, but it
>> seems like it will take a couple of more weeks. So I think that it's
>> best to work on the branch from now on. I will do a merge this week
>> end (trunk into branch) and we will merge back as soon as MINA
>> 2.0.0-M4 will be ready.
>
> There are two branches, apacheds-mina2 and ads-mina2.0. I guess one of
> them is obsolete. Shouldn't we remove it?
No, in fact, both are necessary. The ads-mina2.0 branch is equivalent to
apacheds-with-dependencies. The other one (apacheds-mina2) is the
apacheds sub-project.
I should have named the first branch ads-mina2-with-dependencies, making
things crystal clear...
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Stefan Zoerner <st...@labeo.de>.
Hi Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Well, I was expecting MINA 2.0.0-M4 to be released earlier, but it seems
> like it will take a couple of more weeks. So I think that it's best to
> work on the branch from now on. I will do a merge this week end (trunk
> into branch) and we will merge back as soon as MINA 2.0.0-M4 will be ready.
There are two branches, apacheds-mina2 and ads-mina2.0. I guess one of
them is obsolete. Shouldn't we remove it?
Greetings from Hamburg,
Stefan
Re: trunk vs. apacheds-mina2 branch
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Stefan Zoerner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently I see a lot of activity in the apacheds-mina2 branch. I
> planned to improve the javadoc of the partition related interfaces.
> Does it make sense to do this on trunk? Or should I do that in
> apacheds-mina2? Is there any schedule for a merge?
Well, I was expecting MINA 2.0.0-M4 to be released earlier, but it seems
like it will take a couple of more weeks. So I think that it's best to
work on the branch from now on. I will do a merge this week end (trunk
into branch) and we will merge back as soon as MINA 2.0.0-M4 will be ready.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefan
>
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org