You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Kirill Tkalenko (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/10/16 06:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-16782) Revision of work with InternalTableImpl#partitionMap

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kirill Tkalenko updated IGNITE-16782:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 3.2
                       (was: 3.1)

> Revision of work with InternalTableImpl#partitionMap
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-16782
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16782
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Assignee: Kirill Tkalenko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>
> During development, I discovered that we have *org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.storage.InternalTableImpl#partitionMap* and *org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.storage.InternalTableImpl#updatePartMapMux* that do not always go together, which can cause problems when changing this map in parallel and reading it.
>  
> It seems we can eliminate some of the concurrency issues using a ConcurrentHashMap instead of Int2ObjectMap. But to eliminate all of the concurrency issues need to more complex investigation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)