RE: turbine + tomcat single signon?

["Dan K." <da...@YorkU.CA>]

Hi.  I'd like to pursue it further too.

I'm sure others will probably be interested so perhaps it's a good time
to start the ball rolling at least.

I've been hacking the tomcat/turbine code a bit to test things out and
getting it to work with our current authentication scheme.  So far,
Tomcat's single sign-on stuff seems to be overwhelmingly complicated...

Regards,
Dan

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Hugh Brien wrote:

> It is funny you bring this up. I was just looking into this on Friday.   I don't think it would be very difficult.  I stubbed out a test Realm class to make sure I could get a test case working.  The only issue I found is that the source code has changed between  4.0.1 and 4.0.3.  4.0.3 has added User,Group, and Role interfaces to the source tree that were not there in 4.0.1.  I spent Thursday night (morning) roaming the Tomcat cat source code.   I need to write an email to the writer of this code to see where they are on implmentation.
>
> I would like to to pursue this futher.
>
> r,
> Hugh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan K. [mailto:dantest@YorkU.CA]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:34 PM
> To: turbine-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: turbine + tomcat single signon?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering has anyone here used or thought of using turbine 2.1
> (or even 3.x) with tomcat's single signon feature?  If so, would you like
> to share your thoughts on it?
>
> Regards,
> Dan
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>