Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[David Uebelacker <da...@uebelacker.eu>]

Hi,

you mean MyFaces 1.2 or 2.0 ?

I'am using Facelets 1.1.13 + MyFaces 1.2.0 + Tomahawk 1.1.6 (+Trinidad 1.2.2) without major problems!

David


Wolf Benz schrieb:
> It's just to soon.
> If you try to use Facelets 1.1.13 + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk 1.1.6,
> whether with the taglibs declared in web.xml, or with the taglibs in
> the jars -- it does't work.
>
> h: and f: tags work fine, but all Tomahawk tags are just not rendered.
> -> My advice: wait, or drop Facelets. Then all works again.
>
> -Wolf
>
>   

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>]

Fintan Conway schrieb:
> If you get your wife to play Playstation with the kids this will free
> your time for working on Tomahawk, etc ;-)))
> 
Better idea, let the wife and kifs work on Tomahawk and spend the time
on the playstation yourself
*scnr*

RE: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Fintan Conway <Fi...@esb.ie>]

If you get your wife to play Playstation with the kids this will free
your time for working on Tomahawk, etc ;-)))

-----Original Message-----
From: Wolf Benz [mailto:eurojava@gmail.com] 
Sent: 11 October 2007 12:21
To: MyFaces Discussion; werner.punz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk


Hi Werner,

I hope it too.
Toma has some darn fine components if they work.
Perhaps the (MF/Toma)site could add some extra cautions in the mean
time. Bruno estimates that most bugs don't even require too much work
(taglib configuration stuff) but as you say... alltogether for most
people it's all these extras that come on top and there's "life" beyond
work too! (Playstation, kids, wife ;-)

-Wolf

On 10/11/07, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wolf Benz schrieb:
>
> > Perhaps when Tomahawk gets its 2.0 release, but I don;t see too much

> > evolution in that area. Bruno seems the only one to care but 
> > currently has a lot other (day-job!) stuff going on.
> >
> Day job issues are a big problem for many committers currently. My 
> working week currently for instance consists of 60-70 hours just jobs.

> Anyway, I jope some movement in the Tomahawk area will come soon, I 
> will switch jobs on november the first I will be at Irian from then 
> on, I hope this will give me some opportunities to drive Tomahawk 
> forward, since Irian is a JSF to the core company.
>
> I am one of the Tomahawk committers and would love to do some stuff on

> it, but 60-70  hours average weeks kept me away from any commits. I am

> sure I am not alone in this area. I am not a tomahawk core person but 
> my hope is that my job switch to Irian will help the project to be 
> driven forward. (one of the reasons for the switch was that I couldnt 
> find any time anymore to do real myfaces work in my current job 
> structure)
>
>
>
>

* ** *** ** * ** *** ** * ** *** ** *
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily
represent those of ESB.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.

Although ESB scans e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee
that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained
as a result of viruses.

Company Registration Information: http://www.esb.ie/companies
* ** *** ** * ** *** ** * ** *** ** *

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>]

Wolf Benz schrieb:
> Hi Werner,
> 
> I hope it too.
> Toma has some darn fine components if they work.
> Perhaps the (MF/Toma)site could add some extra cautions in the mean time.
> Bruno estimates that most bugs don't even require too much work
> (taglib configuration stuff)
> but as you say... alltogether for most people it's all these extras
> that come on top and there's "life" beyond work too! (Playstation,
> kids, wife ;-)
> 
Problem is even private live can be a lot of work once you hit the 30s ;-)

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Wolf Benz <eu...@gmail.com>]

I will resume that soon

-- Great great great!

> Wife... and mother-in-law! (she actually believes I am some kind of
> strange person because spending so many times in front of the
> computer)...

-- I am convinced mothers-in-law will always believe their sons-in-law
are weird creatures, if only because their precious daughter chose -of
all people- "you" instead of her.
They went to diapers, breast-feeding, teenage horror and ... when all
of it finally seemed to come at a presentable end, they run off with
someone that doesn't even seem to bother about all the former. (apart
from, perhaps the breast-feeding part)
We're really drifting off now, although the association between a
Tomahawk axe and mother-in-law is usually not that far-fetched :-)

-Wolf

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

Hi there,

On 11/10/2007, Wolf Benz <eu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Werner,
>
> I hope it too.
> Toma has some darn fine components if they work.
> Perhaps the (MF/Toma)site could add some extra cautions in the mean time.
> Bruno estimates that most bugs don't even require too much work
> (taglib configuration stuff)

If you are you talking about the tomahawk-facelets project at google,
that is true. Only some minor tweakings will fix the tomahawk-facelets
compatibility using that project.
If you refer to Tomahawk .next itself, it is still in an early stage.
Last time, I was playing with the maven-faces-plugin for tomahawk but
could not manage to make it work yet! I will resume that soon

> but as you say... alltogether for most people it's all these extras
> that come on top and there's "life" beyond work too! (Playstation,
> kids, wife ;-)
>

Wife... and mother-in-law! (she actually believes I am some kind of
strange person because spending so many times in front of the
computer)...

Cheers,

Bruno

> -Wolf
>
> On 10/11/07, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wolf Benz schrieb:
> >
> > > Perhaps when Tomahawk gets its 2.0 release, but I don;t see too much
> > > evolution in that area. Bruno seems the only one to care but currently
> > > has a lot other (day-job!) stuff going on.
> > >
> > Day job issues are a big problem for many committers currently. My
> > working week currently for instance consists of 60-70 hours just jobs.
> > Anyway, I jope some movement in the Tomahawk area will come soon, I will
> > switch jobs on november the first I will be at Irian from then on, I
> > hope this will give me some opportunities to drive Tomahawk forward,
> > since Irian is a JSF to the core company.
> >
> > I am one of the Tomahawk committers and would love to do some stuff on
> > it, but 60-70  hours average weeks kept me away from any commits.
> > I am sure I am not alone in this area.
> > I am not a tomahawk core person but my hope is that my job switch to
> > Irian will help the project to be driven forward.
> > (one of the reasons for the switch was that I couldnt find any time
> > anymore to do real myfaces work in my current job structure)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Wolf Benz <eu...@gmail.com>]

Hi Werner,

I hope it too.
Toma has some darn fine components if they work.
Perhaps the (MF/Toma)site could add some extra cautions in the mean time.
Bruno estimates that most bugs don't even require too much work
(taglib configuration stuff)
but as you say... alltogether for most people it's all these extras
that come on top and there's "life" beyond work too! (Playstation,
kids, wife ;-)

-Wolf

On 10/11/07, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wolf Benz schrieb:
>
> > Perhaps when Tomahawk gets its 2.0 release, but I don;t see too much
> > evolution in that area. Bruno seems the only one to care but currently
> > has a lot other (day-job!) stuff going on.
> >
> Day job issues are a big problem for many committers currently. My
> working week currently for instance consists of 60-70 hours just jobs.
> Anyway, I jope some movement in the Tomahawk area will come soon, I will
> switch jobs on november the first I will be at Irian from then on, I
> hope this will give me some opportunities to drive Tomahawk forward,
> since Irian is a JSF to the core company.
>
> I am one of the Tomahawk committers and would love to do some stuff on
> it, but 60-70  hours average weeks kept me away from any commits.
> I am sure I am not alone in this area.
> I am not a tomahawk core person but my hope is that my job switch to
> Irian will help the project to be driven forward.
> (one of the reasons for the switch was that I couldnt find any time
> anymore to do real myfaces work in my current job structure)
>
>
>
>

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>]

Wolf Benz schrieb:

> Perhaps when Tomahawk gets its 2.0 release, but I don;t see too much
> evolution in that area. Bruno seems the only one to care but currently
> has a lot other (day-job!) stuff going on.
> 
Day job issues are a big problem for many committers currently. My
working week currently for instance consists of 60-70 hours just jobs.
Anyway, I jope some movement in the Tomahawk area will come soon, I will
switch jobs on november the first I will be at Irian from then on, I
hope this will give me some opportunities to drive Tomahawk forward,
since Irian is a JSF to the core company.

I am one of the Tomahawk committers and would love to do some stuff on
it, but 60-70  hours average weeks kept me away from any commits.
I am sure I am not alone in this area.
I am not a tomahawk core person but my hope is that my job switch to
Irian will help the project to be driven forward.
(one of the reasons for the switch was that I couldnt find any time
anymore to do real myfaces work in my current job structure)

Re: Don't use Facelets + MyFaces 2.0 + Tomahawk

[Wolf Benz <eu...@gmail.com>]

> you mean MyFaces 1.2 or 2.0 ?

-- I tried both MF 1.2.0 and 1.2.1.

> I'am using Facelets 1.1.13 + MyFaces 1.2.0 + Tomahawk 1.1.6 (+Trinidad 1.2.2) without major problems!

-- Try using some Tomahawk components. :-)
E.g. t:selectItems & t:inputCalendar have (JIRA documented) bugs.
Btw I switched to 1.2.1 as 120 had a bug in combination with facelets
that was again corrected in 1.2.1.
Currently I'm switching back to MF1.1, I have to deliver software and
this stack just isn't production material yet, it has slowed me down
with 2 months.
Perhaps when Tomahawk gets its 2.0 release, but I don;t see too much
evolution in that area. Bruno seems the only one to care but currently
has a lot other (day-job!) stuff going on.

-Wolf