You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> on 2019/10/08 01:14:01 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Hi Jark,
I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.9.1,
> as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * JIRA release notes [1],
> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement blog
> post [6].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>
> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
> [1]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> [5]
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Thanks everyone for checking the release and voting!
I’ll summary the voting result in a separate email.
Cheers,
Jark
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 16:41, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1(binding)
> - Verified signatures and checksums.
> - Verified a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
> without suspicious output.
> - Verified all POM files point to the right version.
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月17日周四 下午11:45写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified signatures and checksums
> > - Source archive does not contain any new binaries
> > - Successfully built Flink from sources for Hadoop 2.7.5 and Scala 2.12
> > - Verified that no new dependencies have been added
> > - Verified that the last release-1.9 cron job passed. The cron job being
> > executed on the 03.10. had one failing profile where no output was
> > generated during maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process. I think this
> is
> > not a problem.
> > - Started a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
> > - Verified that logs and out file don't contain suspicious output
> > modulo FLINK-14385
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > > - Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to
> > 1.8.3
> > > > and 1.9.2.
> > > >
> > > > Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the
> > > > verification.
> > > > I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
> > > > The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes
> or
> > > any
> > > > blocker issue is found.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jark
> > > >
> > > > > 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <my...@live.com> 写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > I think FLINK-14385<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> > > > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to
> release
> > > > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Yun Tang
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > > > > To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Do the following checks and all are success.
> > > > > - Verified signatures and hashes.
> > > > > - Built from the source archive.
> > > > > - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> > > > > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> > > > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > > > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> > > > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > > > c. Read write hdfs files.
> > > > > d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minor comments(not blocker)
> > > > > - One comment about the website pr.
> > > > > - Found an issue that there are
> > > > > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> > > > > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new
> users
> > > and
> > > > > would be nice if can be improved. (
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best, Hequn
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Jingsong,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these
> > > > issues.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Jark
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > > > >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > > > >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > > > >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have
> > Apache
> > > > >> headers
> > > > >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > > > >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down.
> > > > verified
> > > > >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > > > >>> All succeeded.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0,
> do
> > > you
> > > > >> need
> > > > >>> modify fix version?
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Best,
> > > > >>> Jingsong Lee
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> +1 from my side.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> - checked signatures and hashes
> > > > >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> > > > >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > > > >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11
> > > successfully
> > > > >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1
> to
> > > > check
> > > > >>>> dependencies, looks good
> > > > >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples,
> > > verified
> > > > >> web
> > > > >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > >>>> Jark
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>> Jark
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <
> > > sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker
> > > issues.
> > > > >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the
> > fix
> > > of
> > > > >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>> Jincheng
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've
> > > > marked
> > > > >>>> the
> > > > >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a
> new
> > > RC,
> > > > >> then
> > > > >>>>>>> we
> > > > >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to
> update
> > > the
> > > > >> fix
> > > > >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > > >>>>>>> Till
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <
> > > trohrmann@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I
> > would
> > > > >> also
> > > > >>>>>>> be
> > > > >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close
> > the
> > > > >>>>>>> ticket, I
> > > > >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > > >>>>>>>> Till
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese
> National
> > > Day
> > > > >>>> and
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> > > > >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I
> > > guess
> > > > we
> > > > >>>>>>> have
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> > > > >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC.
> What
> > do
> > > > you
> > > > >>>>>>> think
> > > > >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4
> > > days
> > > > >>>> ago?
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> > > > >>>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <
> wander4096@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but
> > > given
> > > > >>>>>>> 1.9.1
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that
> we're
> > > sure
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> tison.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> the
> > > > >> version
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> specific
> > > > >>>>>>> comments)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> > which
> > > > >>>>>>> includes:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary
> convenience
> > > > >>>>>>> releases to
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with
> the
> > > key
> > > > >>>> with
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > Repository
> > > > >>>> [4],
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > > >>>>>>> announcement
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> blog
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > > >>>> affirmative
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
+1(binding)
- Verified signatures and checksums.
- Verified a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
without suspicious output.
- Verified all POM files point to the right version.
Best,
Jincheng
Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月17日周四 下午11:45写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signatures and checksums
> - Source archive does not contain any new binaries
> - Successfully built Flink from sources for Hadoop 2.7.5 and Scala 2.12
> - Verified that no new dependencies have been added
> - Verified that the last release-1.9 cron job passed. The cron job being
> executed on the 03.10. had one failing profile where no output was
> generated during maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process. I think this is
> not a problem.
> - Started a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
> - Verified that logs and out file don't contain suspicious output
> modulo FLINK-14385
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > - Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully
> >
> > Best,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to
> 1.8.3
> > > and 1.9.2.
> > >
> > > Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the
> > > verification.
> > > I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
> > > The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or
> > any
> > > blocker issue is found.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jark
> > >
> > > > 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <my...@live.com> 写道：
> > > >
> > > > I think FLINK-14385<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> > > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release
> > > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Yun Tang
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > > > To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Do the following checks and all are success.
> > > > - Verified signatures and hashes.
> > > > - Built from the source archive.
> > > > - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> > > > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> > > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> > > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > > c. Read write hdfs files.
> > > > d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
> > > >
> > > > Minor comments(not blocker)
> > > > - One comment about the website pr.
> > > > - Found an issue that there are
> > > > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> > > > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users
> > and
> > > > would be nice if can be improved. (
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
> > > >
> > > > Best, Hequn
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Jingsong,
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these
> > > issues.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Jark
> > > >>
> > > >>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > > >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > > >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > > >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have
> Apache
> > > >> headers
> > > >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > > >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down.
> > > verified
> > > >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > > >>> All succeeded.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do
> > you
> > > >> need
> > > >>> modify fix version?
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Jingsong Lee
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1 from my side.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - checked signatures and hashes
> > > >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> > > >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > > >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11
> > successfully
> > > >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to
> > > check
> > > >>>> dependencies, looks good
> > > >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples,
> > verified
> > > >> web
> > > >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Jark
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <
> > sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker
> > issues.
> > > >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the
> fix
> > of
> > > >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>> Jincheng
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've
> > > marked
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new
> > RC,
> > > >> then
> > > >>>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update
> > the
> > > >> fix
> > > >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>> Till
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <
> > trohrmann@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I
> would
> > > >> also
> > > >>>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close
> the
> > > >>>>>>> ticket, I
> > > >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>> Till
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National
> > Day
> > > >>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> > > >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I
> > guess
> > > we
> > > >>>>>>> have
> > > >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> > > >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What
> do
> > > you
> > > >>>>>>> think
> > > >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4
> > days
> > > >>>> ago?
> > > >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> > > >>>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wander4096@gmail.com
> >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but
> > given
> > > >>>>>>> 1.9.1
> > > >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're
> > sure
> > > >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> tison.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> > > >> version
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > > >>>>>>> comments)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
> which
> > > >>>>>>> includes:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > > >>>>>>> releases to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> > key
> > > >>>> with
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > Repository
> > > >>>> [4],
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > > >>>>>>> announcement
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> blog
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > >>>> affirmative
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
- Verified signatures and checksums
- Source archive does not contain any new binaries
- Successfully built Flink from sources for Hadoop 2.7.5 and Scala 2.12
- Verified that no new dependencies have been added
- Verified that the last release-1.9 cron job passed. The cron job being
executed on the 03.10. had one failing profile where no output was
generated during maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process. I think this is
not a problem.
- Started a local flink cluster and ran the streaming WordCount example
- Verified that logs and out file don't contain suspicious output
modulo FLINK-14385
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> - Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to 1.8.3
> > and 1.9.2.
> >
> > Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the
> > verification.
> > I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
> > The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or
> any
> > blocker issue is found.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jark
> >
> > > 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <my...@live.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> > is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release
> > hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Yun Tang
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > > To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Do the following checks and all are success.
> > > - Verified signatures and hashes.
> > > - Built from the source archive.
> > > - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> > > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> > > a. Both streaming and batch
> > > b. Web UI works fine
> > > c. Read write hdfs files.
> > > d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
> > >
> > > Minor comments(not blocker)
> > > - One comment about the website pr.
> > > - Found an issue that there are
> > > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> > > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users
> and
> > > would be nice if can be improved. (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
> > >
> > > Best, Hequn
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jingsong,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these
> > issues.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jark
> > >>
> > >>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
> > >> headers
> > >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down.
> > verified
> > >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > >>> All succeeded.
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do
> you
> > >> need
> > >>> modify fix version?
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Jingsong Lee
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 from my side.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - checked signatures and hashes
> > >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> > >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11
> successfully
> > >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to
> > check
> > >>>> dependencies, looks good
> > >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples,
> verified
> > >> web
> > >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Jark
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <
> sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker
> issues.
> > >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix
> of
> > >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Jincheng
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've
> > marked
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new
> RC,
> > >> then
> > >>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update
> the
> > >> fix
> > >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <
> trohrmann@apache.org
> > >
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
> > >> also
> > >>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> > >>>>>>> ticket, I
> > >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National
> Day
> > >>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> > >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I
> guess
> > we
> > >>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> > >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do
> > you
> > >>>>>>> think
> > >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4
> days
> > >>>> ago?
> > >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> > >>>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but
> given
> > >>>>>>> 1.9.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're
> sure
> > >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>> tison.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> > >> version
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> > >>>>>>> comments)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> > >>>>>>> includes:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> > >>>>>>> releases to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the
> key
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> Repository
> > >>>> [4],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> > >>>>>>> announcement
> > >>>>>>>>>>> blog
> > >>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > >>>> affirmative
> > >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com>.
+1
- Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
- Start the cluster locally and ran some examples successfully
Best,
Kurt
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:32 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to 1.8.3
> and 1.9.2.
>
> Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the
> verification.
> I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
> The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or any
> blocker issue is found.
>
> Thanks,
> Jark
>
> > 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <my...@live.com> 写道：
> >
> > I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385>
> is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release
> hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
> >
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
> >
> > Best
> > Yun Tang
> > ________________________________
> > From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> > To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Do the following checks and all are success.
> > - Verified signatures and hashes.
> > - Built from the source archive.
> > - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> > - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> > a. Both streaming and batch
> > b. Web UI works fine
> > - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> > a. Both streaming and batch
> > b. Web UI works fine
> > c. Read write hdfs files.
> > d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
> >
> > Minor comments(not blocker)
> > - One comment about the website pr.
> > - Found an issue that there are
> > ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> > example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users and
> > would be nice if can be improved. (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
> >
> > Best, Hequn
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jingsong,
> >>
> >> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these
> issues.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jark
> >>
> >>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> >>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> >>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> >>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
> >> headers
> >>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> >>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down.
> verified
> >>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> >>> All succeeded.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you
> >> need
> >>> modify fix version?
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Jingsong Lee
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 from my side.
> >>>>
> >>>> - checked signatures and hashes
> >>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> >>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> >>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
> >>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to
> check
> >>>> dependencies, looks good
> >>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified
> >> web
> >>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Jark
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Jark
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> >>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> >>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Jincheng
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've
> marked
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC,
> >> then
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the
> >> fix
> >>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
> >> also
> >>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> >>>>>>> ticket, I
> >>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> >>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess
> we
> >>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> >>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do
> you
> >>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
> >>>> ago?
> >>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> >>>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
> >>>>>>> 1.9.1
> >>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> >>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> tison.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> >> version
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> >>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>>>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>>>>> includes:
> >>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>>>>> releases to
> >>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> >>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> >>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >>>> [4],
> >>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>>>>> announcement
> >>>>>>>>>>> blog
> >>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >>>> affirmative
> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> >>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> >>>>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> >>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Thanks @Hequn and @Yun Tang, I set the fixVersion of FLINK-14385 to 1.8.3 and 1.9.2.
Btw, I would really appreciate if any PMC member could help with the verification.
I hope we can release 1.9.1 this week.
The vote will still be open until we reach at least 3 binding votes or any blocker issue is found.
Thanks,
Jark
> 在 2019年10月14日，02:11，Yun Tang <my...@live.com> 写道：
>
> I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385> is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
> ________________________________
> From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
> To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Do the following checks and all are success.
> - Verified signatures and hashes.
> - Built from the source archive.
> - Check repository contains all artifacts.
> - Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
> a. Both streaming and batch
> b. Web UI works fine
> - Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
> a. Both streaming and batch
> b. Web UI works fine
> c. Read write hdfs files.
> d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
>
> Minor comments(not blocker)
> - One comment about the website pr.
> - Found an issue that there are
> ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
> example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users and
> would be nice if can be improved. (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
>
> Best, Hequn
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jingsong,
>>
>> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>>> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
>>> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
>>> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
>>> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
>> headers
>>> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
>>> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified
>>> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
>>> All succeeded.
>>>
>>> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you
>> need
>>> modify fix version?
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jingsong Lee
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 from my side.
>>>>
>>>> - checked signatures and hashes
>>>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
>>>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
>>>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
>>>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
>>>> dependencies, looks good
>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified
>> web
>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jark
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jark
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
>>>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
>>>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Jincheng
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked
>>>> the
>>>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC,
>> then
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the
>> fix
>>>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
>> also
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
>>>>>>> ticket, I
>>>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
>>>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
>>>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
>>>> ago?
>>>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
>>>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
>>>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>>>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> tison.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>> version
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>>>> releases to
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>>> [4],
>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>>>>>>> blog
>>>>>>>>>>> post [6].
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>>> affirmative
>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Yun Tang <my...@live.com>.
I think FLINK-14385<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385> is not introduced from release-1.9 but since when we decide to release hadoop-free Flink form 1.8 [1]
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11266
Best
Yun Tang
________________________________
From: Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 17:28
To: dev <de...@flink.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
+1 (non-binding)
Do the following checks and all are success.
- Verified signatures and hashes.
- Built from the source archive.
- Check repository contains all artifacts.
- Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
a. Both streaming and batch
b. Web UI works fine
- Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
a. Both streaming and batch
b. Web UI works fine
c. Read write hdfs files.
d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
Minor comments(not blocker)
- One comment about the website pr.
- Found an issue that there are
ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users and
would be nice if can be improved. (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
Best, Hequn
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jingsong,
>
> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> > 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
> headers
> > - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified
> > out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > All succeeded.
> >
> > Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you
> need
> > modify fix version?
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingsong Lee
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 from my side.
> >>
> >> - checked signatures and hashes
> >> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> >> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> >> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
> >> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
> >> dependencies, looks good
> >> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified
> web
> >> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jark
> >>
> >> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Jark
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> >>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> >>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Jincheng
> >>>>
> >>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> >>>>
> >>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked
> >> the
> >>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC,
> then
> >>>>> we
> >>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the
> fix
> >>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Till
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
> also
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> >>>>> ticket, I
> >>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
> >> and
> >>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> >>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> >>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
> >>>>> think
> >>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
> >> ago?
> >>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> >>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
> >>>>> 1.9.1
> >>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> >>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> tison.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version
> >>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> >>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>>> includes:
> >>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>>> releases to
> >>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> >> with
> >>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> >>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >> [4],
> >>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>>> announcement
> >>>>>>>>> blog
> >>>>>>>>> post [6].
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >> affirmative
> >>>>>>>>> votes.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> >>>>>>>>> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> >>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> >>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best, Jingsong Lee
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Do the following checks and all are success.
- Verified signatures and hashes.
- Built from the source archive.
- Check repository contains all artifacts.
- Test WordCount on a local standalone cluster.
a. Both streaming and batch
b. Web UI works fine
- Test WordCount on yarn cluster, with 4 nodes.
a. Both streaming and batch
b. Web UI works fine
c. Read write hdfs files.
d. Test session mode and non-session mode.
Minor comments(not blocker)
- One comment about the website pr.
- Found an issue that there are
ClassNotFoundException(java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.exceptions.YarnException) when run the setup
example(under Local Flink Cluster). It may be confusing for new users and
would be nice if can be improved. (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14385)
Best, Hequn
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:01 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jingsong,
>
> Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> > 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> > - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> > - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> > - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache
> headers
> > - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> > - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified
> > out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> > All succeeded.
> >
> > Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you
> need
> > modify fix version?
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
> >
> > Best,
> > Jingsong Lee
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 from my side.
> >>
> >> - checked signatures and hashes
> >> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> >> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> >> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
> >> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
> >> dependencies, looks good
> >> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified
> web
> >> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jark
> >>
> >> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Jark
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> >>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> >>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Jincheng
> >>>>
> >>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> >>>>
> >>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked
> >> the
> >>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC,
> then
> >>>>> we
> >>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the
> fix
> >>>>> version to 1.9.1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Till
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would
> also
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> >>>>> ticket, I
> >>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Zili,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
> >> and
> >>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
> >>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> >>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
> >>>>> think
> >>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
> >> ago?
> >>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> >>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
> >>>>> 1.9.1
> >>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> >>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> tison.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version
> >>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
> >>>>>>>>> as follows:
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>>>> comments)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>>>> includes:
> >>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>>>> releases to
> >>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> >> with
> >>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> >>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> >> [4],
> >>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>>>> announcement
> >>>>>>>>> blog
> >>>>>>>>> post [6].
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> >> affirmative
> >>>>>>>>> votes.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> >>>>>>>>> [2]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> >>>>>>>>> [5]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> >>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best, Jingsong Lee
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jingsong,
Thanks for verifying. I updated the fixVersion to 1.9.2 for these issues.
Best,
Jark
> 在 2019年10月12日，16:45，Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
> - Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
> - Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> - Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache headers
> - Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
> - Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified
> out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
> All succeeded.
>
> Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you need
> modify fix version?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
>
> Best,
> Jingsong Lee
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 from my side.
>>
>> - checked signatures and hashes
>> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
>> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
>> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
>> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
>> dependencies, looks good
>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified web
>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jark
>>>
>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
>>>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
>>>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jincheng
>>>>
>>>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
>>>>
>>>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked
>> the
>>>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then
>>>>> we
>>>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
>>>>> version to 1.9.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also
>>>>> be
>>>>>> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
>>>>> ticket, I
>>>>>> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Zili,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
>> and
>>>>>>> Flink Forward Europe,
>>>>>>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
>>>>> have
>>>>>>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
>>>>>>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
>>>>> think
>>>>>>> @Till @Jincheng?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
>> ago?
>>>>>>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
>>>>>>> <wa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Jark,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
>>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>>>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>>>>>>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> tison.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1,
>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>>>> releases to
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
>> with
>>>>>>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>> [4],
>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>>>> announcement
>>>>>>>>> blog
>>>>>>>>> post [6].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> affirmative
>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Jark
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>>>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best, Jingsong Lee
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jingsong Li <ji...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
- Check if checksums files match the corresponding release files
- Check if GPG files match the corresponding release files
- Verify that the source archives do not contains any binaries
- Build the source with Maven to ensure all source files have Apache headers
- Check that all POM files point to the same version (1.9.1)
- Start a local cluster both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, and shut down. verified
out and log, verified we ui. run examples.
All succeeded.
Hi Jark, there are some JIRA issue still use fix version 1.9.0, do you need
modify fix version?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14328
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14327
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14215
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14072
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12576
Best,
Jingsong Lee
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from my side.
>
> - checked signatures and hashes
> - checked that all POM files point to the same version
> - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
> - manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
> dependencies, looks good
> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified web
> ui and log output, nothing unexpected
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> >> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> >> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jincheng
> >>
> >> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> >>
> >>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked
> the
> >>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then
> >>> we
> >>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
> >>> version to 1.9.1.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Till
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also
> >>> be
> >>> > fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> >>> >
> >>> > I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
> >>> ticket, I
> >>> > will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers,
> >>> > Till
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Hi Zili,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day
> and
> >>> >> Flink Forward Europe,
> >>> >> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
> >>> have
> >>> >> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> >>> >> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
> >>> think
> >>> >> @Till @Jincheng?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days
> ago?
> >>> >> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> >>> >> <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Best,
> >>> >> Jark
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Hi Jark,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
> >>> 1.9.1
> >>> >>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> >>> >>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Best,
> >>> >>> tison.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> >>> >>>> 1.9.1,
> >>> >>>> as follows:
> >>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> >>> comments)
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> >>> includes:
> >>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
> >>> releases to
> >>> >>>> be
> >>> >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key
> with
> >>> >>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> >>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
> [4],
> >>> >>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> >>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
> >>> announcement
> >>> >>>> blog
> >>> >>>> post [6].
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>> >>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> affirmative
> >>> >>>> votes.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Thanks,
> >>> >>>> Jark
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> [1]
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> >>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> >>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>> >>>> [4]
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> >>> >>>> [5]
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> >>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
--
Best, Jingsong Lee
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
+1 from my side.
- checked signatures and hashes
- checked that all POM files point to the same version
- verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries
- build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully
- manually verified the diff pom files between 1.9.0 and 1.9.1 to check
dependencies, looks good
- started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified web
ui and log output, nothing unexpected
Best,
Jark
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:18, Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
>> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
>> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jincheng
>>
>> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
>>
>>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked the
>>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then
>>> we
>>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
>>> version to 1.9.1.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also
>>> be
>>> > fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
>>> >
>>> > I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
>>> ticket, I
>>> > will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Till
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Zili,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and
>>> >> Flink Forward Europe,
>>> >> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
>>> have
>>> >> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
>>> >> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
>>> think
>>> >> @Till @Jincheng?
>>> >>
>>> >> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago?
>>> >> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
>>> >> <wa...@gmail.com>
>>> >>
>>> >> Best,
>>> >> Jark
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Jark,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given
>>> 1.9.1
>>> >>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>>> >>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Best,
>>> >>> tison.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>> >>>> 1.9.1,
>>> >>>> as follows:
>>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> comments)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience
>>> releases to
>>> >>>> be
>>> >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>> >>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> >>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>> announcement
>>> >>>> blog
>>> >>>> post [6].
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>>> >>>> votes.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>> Jark
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> [1]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> >>>> [4]
>>> >>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>>> >>>> [5]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jincheng and Till, then let's keep on verifying the RC1.
Best,
Jark
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:00, jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
> We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
> FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
>
>> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked the
>> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then we
>> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
>> version to 1.9.1.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also be
>> > fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
>> >
>> > I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the
>> ticket, I
>> > will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Zili,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and
>> >> Flink Forward Europe,
>> >> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we
>> have
>> >> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
>> >> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
>> think
>> >> @Till @Jincheng?
>> >>
>> >> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago?
>> >> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
>> >> <wa...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Jark
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Jark,
>> >>>
>> >>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
>> >>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>> >>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> tison.
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>> >>>> 1.9.1,
>> >>>> as follows:
>> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> includes:
>> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
>> to
>> >>>> be
>> >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> >>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>> announcement
>> >>>> blog
>> >>>> post [6].
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>> >>>> votes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Jark
>> >>>>
>> >>>> [1]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >>>> [4]
>> >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>> >>>> [5]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
I think we should create the new RC when we find the blocker issues.
We can looking forward the other check result, we can add the fix of
FLINK-14315 in to 1.9.1 only we find the blockers.
Best,
Jincheng
Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2019年10月8日周二 下午8:20写道：
> FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked the
> fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then we
> could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
> version to 1.9.1.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also be
> > fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
> >
> > I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the ticket,
> I
> > will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Zili,
> >>
> >> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and
> >> Flink Forward Europe,
> >> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we have
> >> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> >> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you
> think
> >> @Till @Jincheng?
> >>
> >> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago?
> >> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> >> <wa...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jark
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Jark,
> >>>
> >>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
> >>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> >>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> tison.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> >>>> 1.9.1,
> >>>> as follows:
> >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
> >>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
> to
> >>>> be
> >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
> >>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
> >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> >>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
> >>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
> >>>> blog
> >>>> post [6].
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
> >>>> votes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Jark
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
> >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
> >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> >>>> [4]
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
> >>>> [5]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
> >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
> >>>>
> >>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
FLINK-14315 has been merged into the release-1.9 branch. I've marked the
fix version of this ticket as 1.9.2. If we should create a new RC, then we
could include this fix. If this happens, then we need to update the fix
version to 1.9.1.
Cheers,
Till
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> wrote:
> If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also be
> fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
>
> I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the ticket, I
> will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Zili,
>>
>> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and
>> Flink Forward Europe,
>> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we have
>> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
>> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you think
>> @Till @Jincheng?
>>
>> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago?
>> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
>> <wa...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Best,
>> Jark
>>
>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jark,
>>>
>>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
>>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> tison.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>>>
>>>
>>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>>> 1.9.1,
>>>> as follows:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
>>>> be
>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>>>> blog
>>>> post [6].
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>>>
>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>>>> votes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jark
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>>>> [5]
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
If people already spent time on verifying the current RC I would also be
fine to release the fix for FLINK-14315 with Flink 1.9.2.
I will try to merge the PR as soon as possible. When I close the ticket, I
will update the fix version field to 1.9.2.
Cheers,
Till
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:43 AM Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Zili,
>
> Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and
> Flink Forward Europe,
> we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we have
> to extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
> So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you think
> @Till @Jincheng?
>
> I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago?
> Could you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen
> <wa...@gmail.com>
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jark,
>>
>> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
>> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
>> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>>
>>
>> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.9.1,
>>> as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to
>>> be
>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>>> blog
>>> post [6].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>>
>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative
>>> votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jark
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>>> [5]
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.9.1, release candidate #1
Posted by Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com>.
Hi Zili,
Thanks for reminding me this, because of the Chinese National Day and Flink
Forward Europe,
we didn't receive any verification on the 1.9.1 RC1. And I guess we have to
extend the voting time after Flink Forward.
So I'm fine to have FLINK-14315 and rebuild another RC. What do you think
@Till @Jincheng?
I guess FLINK-14315 will be merged soon as it is approved 4 days ago? Could
you help to merge it once it is passed ? @Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com>
Best,
Jark
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 09:14, Zili Chen <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jark,
>
> I notice a critical bug[1] is marked resolved in 1.9.1 but given 1.9.1
> has been cut I'd like to throw the issue here so that we're sure
> whether or not it is included in 1.9.1.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14315
>
>
> Jark Wu <im...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月30日周一 下午3:25写道：
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.9.1,
>> as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>
>>
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be
>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which are signed with the key with
>> fingerprint E2C45417BED5C104154F341085BACB5AEFAE3202 [3],
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> * source code tag "release-1.9.1-rc1" [5],
>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement
>> blog
>> post [6].
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> Please cast your votes before *Oct. 3th 2019, 08:00 UTC*.
>>
>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jark
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346003
>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.1-rc1/
>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1272/
>> [5]
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/4d56de81cb692c68a7d1dbfff13087a5079a8252
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/274
>>
>