Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>]

Non binding obviously but I'm not sure 7 is ready for prime time yet.

The bug we have with random "Argument 'markup' may not be null." and the
one with enclosures not hiding are quite worrying to me.

There's something strange going on and I'm starting to consider going back
to 6.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:05 AM, andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> mmm...not a single one!
>
>  All,
>>
>> I want to build the 7.0 final release this week having the vote across
>> the weekend and shipping it on mon/tuesday.
>>
>> Any objections to this timeline?
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>
>

Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>]

Hi Guillaume,

first, thank you very much for your valuable and precise feedbacks. I 
think I've found a possible reason for the problem with the huge 
wicket_extend id. I hope to able to reproduce the issue and provide more 
details very soon.

Andrea.
> I can confirm everything is running smoothly with 6.20.0. I think the weird
> wicket_extend tag id stuff I posted in the other thread might be a clue to
> understand what happens.
>
> As explained before, it's a very erratic behavior so I can't get a quick
> start reproducing the issue :/.
>

Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>]

I can confirm everything is running smoothly with 6.20.0. I think the weird
wicket_extend tag id stuff I posted in the other thread might be a clue to
understand what happens.

As explained before, it's a very erratic behavior so I can't get a quick
start reproducing the issue :/.

Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>]

We used 6.19.0 before migrating to 7 and I moved this morning to 6.20.0. I
don't see any erratic behaviors so far. I'll report back tomorrow but I'm
pretty sure these issues are specific to 7.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:12 PM, andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> which version of Wicket 6 are/were you using? the problem might not be
> only 7.x related.
>
>
> On 01/07/2015 13:10, Guillaume Smet wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>  There's something strange going on and I'm starting to consider going
>>> back
>>> to 6.
>>>
>>>  Which I had to do this morning after one more report of erratic behavior
>> from an end user :/.
>>
>>
>

Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[andrea del bene <an...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

which version of Wicket 6 are/were you using? the problem might not be 
only 7.x related.

On 01/07/2015 13:10, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There's something strange going on and I'm starting to consider going back
>> to 6.
>>
> Which I had to do this morning after one more report of erratic behavior
> from an end user :/.
>

Re: Wicket 7 finalization

[Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Guillaume Smet <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There's something strange going on and I'm starting to consider going back
> to 6.
>

Which I had to do this morning after one more report of erratic behavior
from an end user :/.

-- 
Guillaume