You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@lucene.apache.org by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> on 2009/11/20 03:53:59 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1
Hi All,
The vote passes. Here are the result tallies:
PMC Votes:
+1 Jukka Zitting
+1 Grant Ignersoll
+1 Chris Mattmann
Non-binding votes:
-1 Karl Heinz Marbaise
Yuan-Fang Li mentioned on TIKA-309 that he is still seeing the behavior,
even after the patch. However, I don't see the behavior after the patch and
commit. Jukka, did the behavior go away for you? I'll hold off slightly on
pushing the release out to the mirrors until I hear back from Yuan-Fang Li,
and others. Yuang-Fang, and all, I'll wait for 48 hours, so if you see the
behavior, voice your opinion between now and then, otherwise, I'll push out
the release based on the above tallies.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Julien Nioche
<li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-271 before the
> release? I can't reopen the issue but have added a comment on it
Can you file the OpenDocumentParser problem as a separate issue
targeted for Tika 0.6? We can make the 0.6 release already next week
if this fix is needed urgently, but I'd rather not reopen the 0.5
release for that.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Could we fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-271 before the
release? I can't reopen the issue but have added a comment on it
Thanks
Julien
--
DigitalPebble Ltd
http://www.digitalpebble.com
2009/11/20 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
> Hi All,
>
> The vote passes. Here are the result tallies:
>
> PMC Votes:
>
> +1 Jukka Zitting
> +1 Grant Ignersoll
> +1 Chris Mattmann
>
> Non-binding votes:
>
> -1 Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> Yuan-Fang Li mentioned on TIKA-309 that he is still seeing the behavior,
> even after the patch. However, I don't see the behavior after the patch and
> commit. Jukka, did the behavior go away for you? I'll hold off slightly on
> pushing the release out to the mirrors until I hear back from Yuan-Fang Li,
> and others. Yuang-Fang, and all, I'll wait for 48 hours, so if you see the
> behavior, voice your opinion between now and then, otherwise, I'll push out
> the release based on the above tallies.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: Chris.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/<http://sunset.usc.edu/%7Emattmann/>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Tika 0.5 release candidate #1
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Yuan-Fang Li mentioned on TIKA-309 that he is still seeing the behavior,
> even after the patch. However, I don't see the behavior after the patch and
> commit. Jukka, did the behavior go away for you?
The test case works, so as far as I'm concerned the issue is fixed.
I'd keep TIKA-309 closed for Tika 0.5. We can file a new issue for 0.6
with a new test case if there still is something to be fixed.
BR,
Jukka Zitting