You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> on 2010/04/03 12:15:09 UTC
[DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Hi all,
attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing since the
first two discuss and vote emails).We still have to [discuss] the
charter for Apache traffic Server, which I believe is
"the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
proxying and caching of HTTP and other related network services"
From the graduation documentation, the resolution/charter charter
should be
"A good resolution is neither too narrow nor too broad. If the project's
scope is too narrow, then its activities will be unnecessarily
constrained. If a project's scope is too broad then it may lack focus
and suffer from governance issues."
Please comment and/or suggest changes to our charter / resolution.
Cheers,
-- leif
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by Mark Nottingham <mn...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Maybe 'intermediation' instead of 'proxying', which is a bit specific.
Cheers,
On 03/04/2010, at 11:15 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing since the first two discuss and vote emails).We still have to [discuss] the charter for Apache traffic Server, which I believe is
>
> "the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to proxying and caching of HTTP and other related network services"
>
>
> From the graduation documentation, the resolution/charter charter should be
>
> "A good resolution is neither too narrow nor too broad. If the project's scope is too narrow, then its activities will be unnecessarily constrained. If a project's scope is too broad then it may lack focus and suffer from governance issues."
>
>
> Please comment and/or suggest changes to our charter / resolution.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- leif
>
> <Resolution.txt>
--
Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by Bryan Call <bc...@yahoo-inc.com>.
After reading the general mailing list and the graduation process guide
(http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel) to see how
other projects (Apache UIMA, Cassandra, and Subversion) have went
through the graduation process, I am going to change the timeline that
Leif and I talked about last week.
I am going to post a message to the incubator general mailing list for
discussion on our graduation before I post a message for voting. This
should push things back a few days, but still gives us enough time for
the resolution to be brought up at the next board meeting (assuming we
pass the vote)...
-Bryan
On 04/06/2010 08:46 AM, Bryan Call wrote:
> I was planning to collect feedback today and send out an email to vote
> on graduation and the resolution to the general mailing list today.
> Giving 72 hours for the vote the vote would be final on Friday.
>
> Yes, I believe Leif doesn't have Internet access. I was asked to
> handle it this week.
>
> -Bryan
>
> On 04/06/2010 05:54 AM, Jason Giedymin wrote:
>> Just a reminder, i think Leif is out of office with no Internet
>> access during this time.
>>
>> There isn't a timeframe for this is there?
>>
>> -Jason
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/03/2010 12:15 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing
>>>> since the
>>>> first two discuss and vote emails).
>>>
>>> You should fill the ${PMC_CHAIR}.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jean-Frederic
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by Bryan Call <bc...@yahoo-inc.com>.
I was planning to collect feedback today and send out an email to vote
on graduation and the resolution to the general mailing list today.
Giving 72 hours for the vote the vote would be final on Friday.
Yes, I believe Leif doesn't have Internet access. I was asked to handle
it this week.
-Bryan
On 04/06/2010 05:54 AM, Jason Giedymin wrote:
> Just a reminder, i think Leif is out of office with no Internet access
> during this time.
>
> There isn't a timeframe for this is there?
>
> -Jason
>
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 04/03/2010 12:15 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing since
>>> the
>>> first two discuss and vote emails).
>>
>> You should fill the ${PMC_CHAIR}.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jean-Frederic
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by Jason Giedymin <ja...@gmail.com>.
Just a reminder, i think Leif is out of office with no Internet access
during this time.
There isn't a timeframe for this is there?
-Jason
On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 04/03/2010 12:15 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing
>> since the
>> first two discuss and vote emails).
>
> You should fill the ${PMC_CHAIR}.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 04/03/2010 12:15 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing since the
> first two discuss and vote emails).
You should fill the ${PMC_CHAIR}.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Re: [DISCUSS] Charter / Resolution
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:15 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> attached is the "final" resolution draft (I've changed nothing since the first two discuss and vote emails).We still have to [discuss] the charter for Apache traffic Server, which I believe is
>
> "the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to proxying and caching of HTTP and other related network services"
>
Sounds good to me.