Add Sonarqube analysis

[Boris Osipov <Bo...@epam.com>]

Hi community,

What do you think about adding Flink code to analysis via Sonarqube http://www.sonarqube.org/ tool?
I've ran analysis on my machine and I'd like to share short report here https://goo.gl/GdfoLm
As you can see, there are some problems with code quality detected by tool.

I found that Apache Software Foundation has the Sonarqube code analytics service https://analysis.apache.org/.
In addition, Travice CI has integration with Sonarqube.com. It is free for open source projects.
We can use one of them for analysis.

Please, share your thoughts.

Best regards,
Boris Osipov

Re: Add Sonarqube analysis

[Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>]

Hi Boris,

I think it is a good idea to gather some more metrics about Flink's code
quality. This can help to address deficiencies and finally improve Flink's
code and test coverage. So +1 for adding it if it does not conflict with
any Apache regulations. But given anlaysis.apache.org it seems to be fine.

Cheers,
Till

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Boris Osipov <Bo...@epam.com>
wrote:

> Hi community,
>
> What do you think about adding Flink code to analysis via Sonarqube
> http://www.sonarqube.org/ tool?
> I've ran analysis on my machine and I'd like to share short report here
> https://goo.gl/GdfoLm
> As you can see, there are some problems with code quality detected by tool.
>
> I found that Apache Software Foundation has the Sonarqube code analytics
> service https://analysis.apache.org/.
> In addition, Travice CI has integration with Sonarqube.com. It is free for
> open source projects.
> We can use one of them for analysis.
>
> Please, share your thoughts.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Osipov
>
>