Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements?

[Jason Davies <ja...@jasondavies.com>]

Hi Niclas,

On 11 Aug 2009, at 09:11, Niclas Hedhman wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jason Davies<ja...@jasondavies.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> As our intention is not to fork this dependency, I assume we do not  
>> require
>> it to go through IP clearance?  If required we could easily  
>> maintain a patch
>> in SVN that gets applied to a clean copy of the upstream code on  
>> building
>> it.
>
> Yes, I think this is reasonable...

Sorry, do you mean we *should* maintain a separate patch that is  
applied at build time, or are you just responding to the question  
about IP clearance?  I should really have split those into separate  
paragraphs :-)
--
Jason Davies

www.jasondavies.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

Re: Do all third-party dependencies require software grant agreements?

[Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>]

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Jason Davies<ja...@jasondavies.com> wrote:

>> Yes, I think this is reasonable...
>
> Sorry, do you mean we *should* maintain a separate patch that is applied at
> build time, or are you just responding to the question about IP clearance?
>  I should really have split those into separate paragraphs :-)

Yes to both. *should* as I wouldn't call it a *must*, and "Yes, no
need for IP clearance"

IANAL
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org