You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Scott Kilpatrick (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/21 15:55:04 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LANG-1323) Type implementations in TypeUtils
compute hash code that breaks Object.equals() with Sun's OpenJDK
Scott Kilpatrick created LANG-1323:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Type implementations in TypeUtils compute hash code that breaks Object.equals() with Sun's OpenJDK
Key: LANG-1323
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1323
Project: Commons Lang
Issue Type: Bug
Components: lang.reflect.*
Affects Versions: 3.5, 3.2
Environment: Sun OpenJDK
Reporter: Scott Kilpatrick
Priority: Minor
{{TypeUtils}} in {{lang.reflect}} provides convenient methods for creating objects of the interface {{Type}}. Those objects are defined by the following classes:
* ParameterizedTypeImpl (implements {{ParameterizedType}})
* WildcardTypeImpl (implements {{WildcardType}})
* GenericArrayTypeImpl (implements {{GenericArrayType}})
Similarly, there are corresponding classes, which implement the same interfaces, defined in one's particular JDK. And it's these latter classes that are instantiated when you get objects of type {{Type}} via reflection. Let's call these the "internal {{Type}} implementations." In the case of Sun's OpenJDK, [they are defined|http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/file/687fd7c7986d/src/share/classes/sun/reflect/generics/reflectiveObjects] in package {{sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects}}.
Each of the {{TypeUtils}} classes implements {{Object.equals(Object)}} in a general way that's compatible with the internal {{Type}} implementations. For example, if I access a field declared with type {{Map<String, Integer>}} and get its generic type, via {{Field.getGenericType()}}, then that will be equal to the {{TypeUtils}} object returned by:
{code:java}
TypeUtils.parameterize(Map.class, String.class, Integer.class)
{code}
That's what I'd expect, so that's great.
However, the {{TypeUtils}} classes implement their {{Object.hashCode()}} method in a _different_ way from the corresponding implementations in Sun OpenJDK implementations. That's not so surprising, _but it breaks the contract of {{Object.hashCode()}}_:
bq. If two objects are equal according to the {{equals(Object)}} method, then calling the {{hashCode}} method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.
In other words, the two {{Type}} objects above will both consider themselves {{equals}} to each other, but they have different hash codes.
One example of a negative consequence of this problem is a collection class that implements its equality (to other collections) by checking hash codes of its elements, e.g., Guava's immutable collections. If you have {{Type}} objects in those collections, with {{TypeUtils}} {{Type}} objects in {{c1}} and Sun OpenJDK {{Type}} objects in {{c2}}, you will see that {{c1.equals(c2)}} returns {{false}} -- because their elements don't all have the same hash codes -- even though those elements are all considered equal.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)