You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> on 2016/07/11 02:02:00 UTC
0.10.0
With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again what
are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
-Jake
RE: 0.10.0
Posted by Jim King <Ji...@simplivity.com>.
Another possibility is to run those tests in parallel, assuming that the build slave has more than one vCPU. Hopefully it does. I believe all the test servers and clients have a port option already, so we could be running up to 4 tests at a time and using all the CPU available (if there are 4 vCPUs). This would be a huge win for the cross test time for everyone.
James E. King, III
Architect
8 Technology Drive, 2nd Floor
Westborough, MA 01581-1756
Ph: 855-SVT-INFO
-----Original Message-----
From: Kyle Johnson [mailto:kyle@powerworld.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:18 PM
To: dev@thrift.apache.org
Subject: Re: 0.10.0
I'm only a very minor contributor, but it seems that we ought to split out the tests for the cross builds before 0.10.0 release. Nothing is really fixed yet as we're straddling the 48/49 minute mark. If I have opportunity, I'll take a look at the cross builds and see about splitting up the tests because these failing Travis builds look really bad and effectively make the Travis hook useless as currently configured.
Kyle Johnson
PowerWorld Corporation
217-384-6330 x17
kyle@powerworld.com
http://www.powerworld.com
On 7/13/16 2:00 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> I'm going to add our Travis and AppVeyor badges to the README to make
> it clear what the current state is to anyone looking to contribute,
> I've also scripted out applying patches from a github pr to make it
> easier for committers to be able to accept and close an issue, will
> wrap into a new jira issue and get it in before looking at cutting the
> 0.10.0 release candidate
>
> -Jake
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Roger Meier <ro...@bufferoverflow.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 we should ship more often
>>
>> -roger
>> Quoting Randy Abernethy <ra...@apache.org>:
>>
>> +1
>>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again
>>> what
>>>> are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
>>>>
>>>> -Jake
>>>>
>>>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVACY STATEMENT:
This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by SimpliVity and are considered to be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: 0.10.0
Posted by Kyle Johnson <ky...@powerworld.com>.
I'm only a very minor contributor, but it seems that we ought to split
out the tests for the cross builds before 0.10.0 release. Nothing is
really fixed yet as we're straddling the 48/49 minute mark. If I have
opportunity, I'll take a look at the cross builds and see about
splitting up the tests because these failing Travis builds look really
bad and effectively make the Travis hook useless as currently configured.
Kyle Johnson
PowerWorld Corporation
217-384-6330 x17
kyle@powerworld.com
http://www.powerworld.com
On 7/13/16 2:00 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> I'm going to add our Travis and AppVeyor badges to the README to make it
> clear what the current state is to anyone looking to contribute, I've also
> scripted out applying patches from a github pr to make it easier for
> committers to be able to accept and close an issue, will wrap into a new
> jira issue and get it in before looking at cutting the 0.10.0 release
> candidate
>
> -Jake
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Roger Meier <ro...@bufferoverflow.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 we should ship more often
>>
>> -roger
>> Quoting Randy Abernethy <ra...@apache.org>:
>>
>> +1
>>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again what
>>>> are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
>>>>
>>>> -Jake
>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: 0.10.0
Posted by Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>.
I'm going to add our Travis and AppVeyor badges to the README to make it
clear what the current state is to anyone looking to contribute, I've also
scripted out applying patches from a github pr to make it easier for
committers to be able to accept and close an issue, will wrap into a new
jira issue and get it in before looking at cutting the 0.10.0 release
candidate
-Jake
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Roger Meier <ro...@bufferoverflow.ch>
wrote:
> +1 we should ship more often
>
> -roger
> Quoting Randy Abernethy <ra...@apache.org>:
>
> +1
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again what
>>> are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
>>>
>>> -Jake
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: 0.10.0
Posted by Roger Meier <ro...@bufferoverflow.ch>.
+1 we should ship more often
-roger
Quoting Randy Abernethy <ra...@apache.org>:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again what
>> are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
>>
>> -Jake
>>
Re: 0.10.0
Posted by Randy Abernethy <ra...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
> With the builds now solely on travis and the pre-commit green again what
> are peoples thoughts on cutting 0.10.0, any objections?
>
> -Jake
>