You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by wolverine my <wo...@gmail.com> on 2007/01/09 07:47:35 UTC
Memory leak?
Hi!
Emmanuel Lecharny mentioned in his ApacheCon Europe 06's presentation
slides that ApacheDS has a lot of bus to be fixed, and that including
memory leaks!
May I know if the memory leaks has been fixed?
Or this is still a on-going issue?
Re: Memory leak?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
No, you can go with 1.0.0. Or you can checkout the current trunk.
On 1/10/07, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qu...@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:05 PM +0800 wolverine my
> <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed something like 50 bugs
> >> since, (may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3
> >> folds (900 req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind
> >> of load test ( the server has been running for 72 h being requested at
> >> the maximum requests rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests,
> >> without a problem - except that my CPU was damn hot ! :)
> >>
> >> 1.0 has been released
> >> (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html),
> >> it has been certified by OpenGroup (
> >> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm),
> >> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
> >>
> >> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out
> >> within the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be
> >> fixed in this coming version.
>
> So if someone wanted to benchmark ApacheDS, you would suggest waiting for
> the 1.0.1 release?
>
> --Quanah
>
>
> --
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Developer
> ITS/Shared Application Services
> Stanford University
> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
>
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: Memory leak?
Posted by Quanah Gibson-Mount <qu...@stanford.edu>.
--On Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:05 PM +0800 wolverine my
<wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed something like 50 bugs
>> since, (may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3
>> folds (900 req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind
>> of load test ( the server has been running for 72 h being requested at
>> the maximum requests rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests,
>> without a problem - except that my CPU was damn hot ! :)
>>
>> 1.0 has been released
>> (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html),
>> it has been certified by OpenGroup (
>> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm),
>> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
>>
>> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out
>> within the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be
>> fixed in this coming version.
So if someone wanted to benchmark ApacheDS, you would suggest waiting for
the 1.0.1 release?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
Re: Memory leak?
Posted by wolverine my <wo...@gmail.com>.
OK, thanks for the quick response!
I think it would be very useful to put up the performance benchmark in
ApacheDS homepage.
On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed somthing like 50 bugs since,
> (may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3 folds (900
> req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind of load test (
> the server has been running for 72 h being requested at the maximum requests
> rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests, without a problem - except
> that my CPU was damn hot ! :)
>
> 1.0 has been released
> (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html),
> it has been certified by OpenGroup (
> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm),
> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
>
> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out within
> the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be fixed in
> this coming version.
>
> So, regarding MemoryLeaks, I will say that, yes, we have found and fixed the
> most visible ones. But as stated in any M$ software licence : "...IN NO
> EVENT SHALL xxxxx OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
> INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER..."
>
> Have fun with ADS !
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> On 1/9/07, wolverine my < wolverine.my@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Emmanuel Lecharny mentioned in his ApacheCon Europe 06's presentation
> > slides that ApacheDS has a lot of bus to be fixed, and that including
> > memory leaks!
> >
> > May I know if the memory leaks has been fixed?
> > Or this is still a on-going issue?
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
Re: Memory leak?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
those slides are damn old now... We have fixed somthing like 50 bugs since,
(may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3 folds (900
req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind of load test (
the server has been running for 72 h being requested at the maximum requests
rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests, without a problem - except
that my CPU was damn hot ! :)
1.0 has been released (
http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html), it has been
certified by OpenGroup (
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm), so I guess we
are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out within
the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be fixed in
this coming version.
So, regarding MemoryLeaks, I will say that, yes, we have found and fixed the
most visible ones. But as stated in any M$ software licence : "...IN NO
EVENT SHALL xxxxx OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER..."
Have fun with ADS !
Emmanuel
On 1/9/07, wolverine my <wo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny mentioned in his ApacheCon Europe 06's presentation
> slides that ApacheDS has a lot of bus to be fixed, and that including
> memory leaks!
>
> May I know if the memory leaks has been fixed?
> Or this is still a on-going issue?
>
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com