You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@shenyu.apache.org by zcq <zc...@zhucongqi.cn> on 2021/09/18 05:20:35 UTC

Selector discussion

Hi ,

why not use "url" or "upstreamUrl" for the naming of 'the selector 's handle data 'ip:port' . in fact, "DivideUpstream" using the "upstreamUrl".

Re: Selector discussion

Posted by 张磊 <sa...@apache.org>.

Hi, I think ip:port more directly

XiaoYu <xi...@apache.org> 于2021年9月18日周六 下午2:39写道：

> Hi，
>
> It's just a matter of naming
>
> zcq <zc...@zhucongqi.cn> 于2021年9月18日周六 下午1:21写道：
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > why not use "url" or "upstreamUrl" for the naming of 'the selector 's
> > handle data 'ip:port' . in fact, "DivideUpstream" using the
> "upstreamUrl".
> >
> >
>

Re: Selector discussion

Posted by XiaoYu <xi...@apache.org>.

Hi，

It's just a matter of naming

zcq <zc...@zhucongqi.cn> 于2021年9月18日周六 下午1:21写道：

> Hi ,
>
> why not use "url" or "upstreamUrl" for the naming of 'the selector 's
> handle data 'ip:port' . in fact, "DivideUpstream" using the "upstreamUrl".
>
>

Re: Selector discussion

Posted by wei liu <lw...@apache.org>.

I think ip:port is More intuitive.

zcq <zc...@zhucongqi.cn> 于2021年9月18日周六 下午1:21写道：

> Hi ,
>
> why not use "url" or "upstreamUrl" for the naming of 'the selector 's
> handle data 'ip:port' . in fact, "DivideUpstream" using the "upstreamUrl".
>
>