You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2012/02/01 22:40:59 UTC

svn commit: r1239336 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

Author: trawick
Date: Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
New Revision: 1239336

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239336&view=rev
Log:
gee, some people don't even have a checkout of 1.3.x

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS?rev=1239336&r1=1239335&r2=1239336&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ POST-RETIREMENT SECURITY PATCHES:
 
    *) CVE-2011-3368/CVE-2011-4317
       http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2011-4317-r1235443.patch
-      +1: trawick
+      +1: trawick, wrowe
 
    *) CVE-2012-0053
       http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2012-0053-r1234837.patch
-      +1: trawick
+      +1: trawick, wrowe
       trawick: I'll update the security doc once I get an idea of whether
                or not a patch will be made available.
 



Re: svn commit: r1239336 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Actually, I did find two of them, but when I had replied, I hadn't gone
> digging, and wanted to make it easy for someone, anyone to also vote for
> these patches without returning to STATUS.

sorry for my lame commit message; no complaint/insult/whatever intended ;)

> Since 1.3 branch is closed, shouldn't the STATUS file also be closed?  Just
> don't want anyone to see 'last updated' on that tree and assume it was still
> alive for any purpose whatsoever.  Just my 2c

I started to fret about that but decided not to worry about modifying
this bit of release metadata given the context -- discussion of some
specific support for 1.3 and recent updates to the 1.3 security
document stating that a patch would be available.

>
>
>
> On 2/1/2012 3:40 PM, trawick@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: trawick
>> Date: Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
>> New Revision: 1239336
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239336&view=rev
>> Log:
>> gee, some people don't even have a checkout of 1.3.x
>>
>> Modified:
>>     httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS?rev=1239336&r1=1239335&r2=1239336&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
>> @@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ POST-RETIREMENT SECURITY PATCHES:
>>
>>     *) CVE-2011-3368/CVE-2011-4317
>>        http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2011-4317-r1235443.patch
>> -      +1: trawick
>> +      +1: trawick, wrowe
>>
>>     *) CVE-2012-0053
>>        http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2012-0053-r1234837.patch
>> -      +1: trawick
>> +      +1: trawick, wrowe
>>        trawick: I'll update the security doc once I get an idea of whether
>>                 or not a patch will be made available.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: svn commit: r1239336 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS

Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Actually, I did find two of them, but when I had replied, I hadn't gone
digging, and wanted to make it easy for someone, anyone to also vote for
these patches without returning to STATUS.

Since 1.3 branch is closed, shouldn't the STATUS file also be closed?  Just
don't want anyone to see 'last updated' on that tree and assume it was still
alive for any purpose whatsoever.  Just my 2c



On 2/1/2012 3:40 PM, trawick@apache.org wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
> New Revision: 1239336
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239336&view=rev
> Log:
> gee, some people don't even have a checkout of 1.3.x
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS?rev=1239336&r1=1239335&r2=1239336&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/STATUS Wed Feb  1 21:40:58 2012
> @@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ POST-RETIREMENT SECURITY PATCHES:
>  
>     *) CVE-2011-3368/CVE-2011-4317
>        http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2011-4317-r1235443.patch
> -      +1: trawick
> +      +1: trawick, wrowe
>  
>     *) CVE-2012-0053
>        http://people.apache.org/~trawick/1.3-CVE-2012-0053-r1234837.patch
> -      +1: trawick
> +      +1: trawick, wrowe
>        trawick: I'll update the security doc once I get an idea of whether
>                 or not a patch will be made available.
>  
> 
> 
>