You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Mirko Friedenhagen <mf...@gmail.com> on 2013/06/01 08:44:17 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?
On May 31, 2013 12:08 PM, "Stephen Connolly" <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes 3.1.0-alpha-1 has had/will have at least four respins... primarily
> because the volunteers have been slow stepping up and testing...
And something not voted on, but with different logger implementations had
the same name a few months ago IIRC, which is why I am against reuse and
would prefer skipping.
Otherwise call everything just maven-current and let the creation time be
the version number ;-).
Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?
Posted by Chris Graham <ch...@gmail.com>.
:-) I use a 4 digit no, but I have special requirements. X.Y.Z.N-SNAPSHOT
etc.
-Chris
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen
<mf...@gmail.com>wrote:
> And btw. even SNAPSHOTs are nowadays deployed with a timestamp and so more
> easily identifiable. I like James approach x.y.z-candidate but would be
> happy with steps in z as well.
>
> Regards Mirko
> --
> Sent from my mobile
> On Jun 1, 2013 8:44 AM, "Mirko Friedenhagen" <mf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 2013 12:08 PM, "Stephen Connolly" <
> > stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes 3.1.0-alpha-1 has had/will have at least four respins... primarily
> > > because the volunteers have been slow stepping up and testing...
> >
> > And something not voted on, but with different logger implementations had
> > the same name a few months ago IIRC, which is why I am against reuse and
> > would prefer skipping.
> >
> > Otherwise call everything just maven-current and let the creation time be
> > the version number ;-).
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?
Posted by Mirko Friedenhagen <mf...@gmail.com>.
And btw. even SNAPSHOTs are nowadays deployed with a timestamp and so more
easily identifiable. I like James approach x.y.z-candidate but would be
happy with steps in z as well.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my mobile
On Jun 1, 2013 8:44 AM, "Mirko Friedenhagen" <mf...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On May 31, 2013 12:08 PM, "Stephen Connolly" <
> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes 3.1.0-alpha-1 has had/will have at least four respins... primarily
> > because the volunteers have been slow stepping up and testing...
>
> And something not voted on, but with different logger implementations had
> the same name a few months ago IIRC, which is why I am against reuse and
> would prefer skipping.
>
> Otherwise call everything just maven-current and let the creation time be
> the version number ;-).
>