Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4

[Tangent <ta...@usa.net>]

Hi group,

I wonder if anyone has installed Batik 1.1.1 and the latest JDK 1.4 yet.
Are they compatible with each other?  How about performance?

Thanks!

- Tangent


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org

RE: Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4

[Grant Goodale <gr...@inktomi.com>]

	Has anyone tried running batik against the 1.4 jre without an X
server running?  In other words, does using the 1.4 jre/jdk mean I'm no
longer required to run an X server in order to use batik?

	Regards,

	  Grant Goodale
	  grant@inktomi.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@virgilio.it] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:35 AM
To: Batik Users
Subject: RE: Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4


>I have. My experience was good in terms of compatibility, but not in 
>terms of the performance. Java 1.4 doesn't seem to perform better in 
>rendering than java 1.3.

Ditto - I noticed no difference. The only problems I've had with 1.4 so
far was with an installer that didn't realise that 1.4 > 1.2, and
Netbeans wasn't happy (so I've got 1.3 jars installed as well).

Batik itself seems to be fast, but java2d is not. I have
>already posted some of my test results to this list several days ago, 
>but I can repeat them.

I missed them too - could you please repost.

Cheers,
Danny.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org

RE: Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4

[Danny Ayers <da...@virgilio.it>]

>I have. My experience was good in terms of compatibility, but not in terms
>of the performance. Java 1.4 doesn't seem to perform better in rendering
>than java 1.3.

Ditto - I noticed no difference. The only problems I've had with 1.4 so far
was with an installer that didn't realise that 1.4 > 1.2, and Netbeans
wasn't happy (so I've got 1.3 jars installed as well).

Batik itself seems to be fast, but java2d is not. I have
>already posted some of my test results to this list several days ago, but I
>can repeat them.

I missed them too - could you please repost.

Cheers,
Danny.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4

[Milan Trninic <mt...@galdosinc.com>]

I have. My experience was good in terms of compatibility, but not in terms
of the performance. Java 1.4 doesn't seem to perform better in rendering
than java 1.3. Batik itself seems to be fast, but java2d is not. I have
already posted some of my test results to this list several days ago, but I
can repeat them.
Milan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tangent" <ta...@usa.net>
To: "'Batik Users'" <ba...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 07:55
Subject: Batik 1.1.1 and Java 1.4


> Hi group,
>
> I wonder if anyone has installed Batik 1.1.1 and the latest JDK 1.4 yet.
> Are they compatible with each other?  How about performance?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Tangent
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xml.apache.org