You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@zeppelin.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/10/24 19:44:28 UTC

[GitHub] [zeppelin] alexott commented on issue #3480: [ZEPPELIN-3644] SPARQL-Interpreter support via Apache Jena ARQ

alexott commented on issue #3480: [ZEPPELIN-3644] SPARQL-Interpreter support via Apache Jena ARQ
URL: https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3480#issuecomment-546073298
 
 
   Just a general question - maybe instead of `sparql` name for interpreter, use something like, `sparql.jena`, so it's possible in the future to use different implementations? Or extend implementation to have different backends selected via configuration?
   
   P.S. I'm really to keen to try this implementation...

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services