[RT] Shielded classloading

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

Trunk has now this nice feature called shielded classloading (which is
an improved version of the paranoid classloader).

Currently our own plugin moves classes and libs to WEB-INF/cocoon/.
As we got bored by discussing which logging framework to use, I think
it's more fun to discuss directory names/locations these days.

I think it would be better if we use a directory name which is
independent of "cocoon" for this stuff.
Why?
a) because shielded classloading is not Cocoon specific - it's used for
the whole webapp.
b) I hope that we get this support into the Maven war plugin some day
and then a more general directory layout would directly fit.

So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes
and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs.

WDYT?
Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>]

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes
>> and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs.
> 
> Looks OK to me. Wouldn't WEB-INF/shielded/classes and WEB-INF/shielded/libs be 
> slightly better? Anyway, +1.
> 
Yepp - I just changed the code according to your suggestion.

Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

[Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes
> and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs.

Looks OK to me. Wouldn't WEB-INF/shielded/classes and WEB-INF/shielded/libs be 
slightly better? Anyway, +1.

Vadim

Re: [RT] Shielded classloading

[Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Trunk has now this nice feature called shielded classloading (which is
> an improved version of the paranoid classloader).
> 
> Currently our own plugin moves classes and libs to WEB-INF/cocoon/.
> As we got bored by discussing which logging framework to use, I think
> it's more fun to discuss directory names/locations these days.
> 
> I think it would be better if we use a directory name which is
> independent of "cocoon" for this stuff.
> Why?
> a) because shielded classloading is not Cocoon specific - it's used for
> the whole webapp.
> b) I hope that we get this support into the Maven war plugin some day
> and then a more general directory layout would directly fit.
> 
> So I propose that we move WEB-INF/classes to WEB-INF/shielded-classes
> and WEB-INF/libs to WEB-INF/shielded-libs.

It make sense to me wrt brining it into the maven-webapp-plugin

+1

Ciao

- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFS8+rLNdJvZjjVZARAh1DAKDSKErYBZp5+J6YnzvFt+dJPNp+vwCg7snP
9yH+VCoRfz0mBg2HFiszp/c=
=0n4T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----