You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> on 2018/02/01 19:25:47 UTC
Re: Clerezza refactoring
+1
Tommaso
2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> Hi Hasan,
>
> Thanks for the good conversation today.
>
> I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager with DataSet
> could look like. I think it would be nice for code like this to work:
>
> Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("http://example.org/g2");
> DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).addNamedGraph(graphName,
> g2).build();
> ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>
> I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com>.
Hi Hasan
Thanks for the good work!
The dataset package seems a bit a leftover of rather messy things. I think having a DataSet interface in the main .api package would allow this package to be focused on proving a secured implementation of this interface.
Cheers,
Reto
-----Original Message-----
From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 9:43 PM
To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
Hi all
@Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> Please checkout the reunited branch and check whether I miss something.
I haven't implemented the idea as discussed in the start of this thread.
But the reunited branch can be a good basis for that.
@Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>, I have resolved CLEREZZA-1036
Kind regards
Hasan
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:44 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Furkan
>
> Have you tried to check the branch? If you have questions, please
> don't hesitate to ask.
> Maybe you can try to solve CLEREZZA-1036.
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:56 PM Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hasan,
>>
>> I'll check the branch and help to refactoring!
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Furkan KAMACI
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
>>> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
>>> from module rdf to a new module.
>>> I have some candidate names for the new module:
>>> - dataset
>>> - graph
>>> - graph.management
>>> - triplecollection.management
>>>
>>> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
>>>
>>> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely
>>> refactored.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Hasan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information.
>>>> I'll take a look this weekend.
>>>>
>>>> Hasan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hasan
>>>>>
>>>>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the
>>>>> parent was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor
>>>>> can be built, but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An
>>>>> approach is to have all modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>>>>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI
>>>>> <fu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of
>>>>> Furkan Kamaci.
>>>>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a
>>>>> look at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step
>>>>> by step to make clerezza better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Hasan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi Hasan
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Reto
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>>>>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>>>>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>>>>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore.
>>>>> > > Sorry
>>>>> Reto.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hasan
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > Hi Hasan
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm
>>>>> using
>>>>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you
>>>>> doing it.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>>>>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > Reto
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>>>>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>>>>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Hi Reto
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür
>>>>> > > > > <re...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>>>>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > thx
>>>>> > > > > hasan
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > Reto
>>>>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>>>>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>>>>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>>>>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > hasan
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>>>>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > +1
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>>>>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it
>>>>> would
>>>>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
>>>>> > > > > > to work:
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>>>>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut
>>>>> > > > > > > > > method
>>>>> for
>>>>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>>>>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>>>>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>>>>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>>>>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>>>>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>>>>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>>>>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT
>>>>> > > > > > > > > ....");
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>>>>> clerezza.
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Hi all
@Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> Please checkout the reunited branch and check
whether I miss something.
I haven't implemented the idea as discussed in the start of this thread.
But the reunited branch can be a good basis for that.
@Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>, I have resolved CLEREZZA-1036
Kind regards
Hasan
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:44 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Furkan
>
> Have you tried to check the branch? If you have questions, please don't
> hesitate to ask.
> Maybe you can try to solve CLEREZZA-1036.
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:56 PM Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hasan,
>>
>> I'll check the branch and help to refactoring!
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Furkan KAMACI
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
>>> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
>>> from module rdf to a new module.
>>> I have some candidate names for the new module:
>>> - dataset
>>> - graph
>>> - graph.management
>>> - triplecollection.management
>>>
>>> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
>>>
>>> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely
>>> refactored.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Hasan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information.
>>>> I'll take a look this weekend.
>>>>
>>>> Hasan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hasan
>>>>>
>>>>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent
>>>>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built,
>>>>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all
>>>>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>>>>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of
>>>>> Furkan Kamaci.
>>>>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look
>>>>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to
>>>>> make clerezza better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Hasan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi Hasan
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Reto
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>>>>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>>>>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>>>>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry
>>>>> Reto.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Hasan
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > Hi Hasan
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm
>>>>> using
>>>>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you
>>>>> doing it.
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>>>>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > Reto
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>>>>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>>>>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > Hi Reto
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>>>>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > thx
>>>>> > > > > hasan
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > Reto
>>>>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>>>>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>>>>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>>>>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > hasan
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>>>>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > +1
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>>>>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it
>>>>> would
>>>>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
>>>>> > > > > > to work:
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>>>>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method
>>>>> for
>>>>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>>>>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>>>>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>>>>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>>>>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>>>>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>>>>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>>>>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>>>>> clerezza.
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>>>>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Furkan
Have you tried to check the branch? If you have questions, please don't
hesitate to ask.
Maybe you can try to solve CLEREZZA-1036.
Cheers
Hasan
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:56 PM Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Hasan,
>
> I'll check the branch and help to refactoring!
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
>> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
>> from module rdf to a new module.
>> I have some candidate names for the new module:
>> - dataset
>> - graph
>> - graph.management
>> - triplecollection.management
>>
>> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
>>
>> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hasan
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Reto
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information.
>>> I'll take a look this weekend.
>>>
>>> Hasan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Hasan
>>>>
>>>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent
>>>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built,
>>>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all
>>>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>>>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>>
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan
>>>> Kamaci.
>>>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look
>>>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to
>>>> make clerezza better.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Hasan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Hasan
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Reto
>>>> >
>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>>>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>>>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>>>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry
>>>> Reto.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hasan
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Hi Hasan
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using
>>>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you
>>>> doing it.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>>>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Cheers,
>>>> > > > Reto
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>>>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>>>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Hi Reto
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>>>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > thx
>>>> > > > > hasan
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > Reto
>>>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>>>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>>>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>>>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > hasan
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>>>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > +1
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>>>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it
>>>> would
>>>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
>>>> > > > > > to work:
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>>>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
>>>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>>>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>>>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>>>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>>>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>>>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>>>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>>>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>>>> clerezza.
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>>>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Hasan,
I'll check the branch and help to refactoring!
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
> from module rdf to a new module.
> I have some candidate names for the new module:
> - dataset
> - graph
> - graph.management
> - triplecollection.management
>
> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
>
> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored.
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Reto
>>
>> Thanks for the information.
>> I'll take a look this weekend.
>>
>> Hasan
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hasan
>>>
>>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent
>>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built,
>>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all
>>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan
>>> Kamaci.
>>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look
>>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to
>>> make clerezza better.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Hasan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Hasan
>>> >
>>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Reto
>>> >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>> > >
>>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>>> > >
>>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry
>>> Reto.
>>> > >
>>> > > Hasan
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Hasan
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using
>>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing
>>> it.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > Reto
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Hi Reto
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > thx
>>> > > > > hasan
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > > > Reto
>>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > hasan
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > +1
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would
>>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
>>> > > > > > to work:
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
>>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>>> clerezza.
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Reto, all.
Sorry, I was sick the whole last week and did not check clerezza emails.
OK. I will move access to dataset, namely to org.apache.clerezza.dataset.
Regarding commons.rdf classes and interfaces, they are moved to
org.apache.clerezza.api.
Since clerezza is about rdf, I remove the rdf in the directory hierarchy.
cheers
hasan
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:19 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> I think org.apache.clerezza.rdf.dataset would be good, with TcManager
> being replaced with Dataset and aligned to the definition in the SPARQL
> spec.
>
> The basic RDF classes/interfaces (now in commons.rdf) I assume will be
> directly in org.clerezza.rdf, is that correct?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 8:16 AM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> Cc: Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>
> Dear all
>
> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
> from module rdf to a new module.
> I have some candidate names for the new module:
> - dataset
> - graph
> - graph.management
> - triplecollection.management
>
> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
>
> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored.
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Reto
> >
> > Thanks for the information.
> > I'll take a look this weekend.
> >
> > Hasan
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Hasan
> >>
> >> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the
> >> parent was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor
> >> can be built, but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An
> >> approach is to have all modules depend on the latests released version
> of the parent.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Reto
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
> >> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >>
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of
> >> Furkan Kamaci.
> >> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look
> >> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step
> >> to make clerezza better.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Hasan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Hasan
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Reto
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> >> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >> > >
> >> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
> >> > >
> >> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> >> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> >> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry
> Reto.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hasan
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Hasan
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm
> >> > > > using now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate
> >> > > > you doing
> >> it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
> >> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > Reto
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> >> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> >> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Reto
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi Hasan
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
> >> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > ah yes, of course.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > thx
> >> > > > > hasan
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > > Reto
> >> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> >> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> >> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Reto
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> >> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > hasan
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> >> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > +1
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Tommaso
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
> >> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it
> >> > > > > > > > > would be nice for code like this
> >> > > > > > to work:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> >> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method
> >> > > > > > > > > for add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> >> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> >> > > > http://example.org/g2");
> >> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
> >> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> >> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> >> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
> >> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
> >> clerezza.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > > > > > Reto
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com>.
Hi Hasan
I think org.apache.clerezza.rdf.dataset would be good, with TcManager being replaced with Dataset and aligned to the definition in the SPARQL spec.
The basic RDF classes/interfaces (now in commons.rdf) I assume will be directly in org.clerezza.rdf, is that correct?
Cheers,
Reto
-----Original Message-----
From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 8:16 AM
To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
Cc: Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
Dear all
Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
from module rdf to a new module.
I have some candidate names for the new module:
- dataset
- graph
- graph.management
- triplecollection.management
Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored.
Cheers
Hasan
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Reto
>
> Thanks for the information.
> I'll take a look this weekend.
>
> Hasan
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hasan
>>
>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the
>> parent was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor
>> can be built, but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An
>> approach is to have all modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of
>> Furkan Kamaci.
>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look
>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step
>> to make clerezza better.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hasan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Hasan
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Reto
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > >
>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>> > >
>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
>> > >
>> > > Hasan
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Hasan
>> > > >
>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm
>> > > > using now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate
>> > > > you doing
>> it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Reto
>> > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi Reto
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > thx
>> > > > > hasan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > Reto
>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > hasan
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it
>> > > > > > > > > would be nice for code like this
>> > > > > > to work:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method
>> > > > > > > > > for add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>> clerezza.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Dear all
Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package
org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access
from module rdf to a new module.
I have some candidate names for the new module:
- dataset
- graph
- graph.management
- triplecollection.management
Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any.
Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored.
Cheers
Hasan
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Reto
>
> Thanks for the information.
> I'll take a look this weekend.
>
> Hasan
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hasan
>>
>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent
>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built,
>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all
>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
>> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan
>> Kamaci.
>> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look at
>> the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make
>> clerezza better.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Hasan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Hasan
>> >
>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Reto
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
>> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > >
>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>> > >
>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
>> > >
>> > > Hasan
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Hasan
>> > > >
>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using
>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing
>> it.
>> > > >
>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
>> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Reto
>> > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
>> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi Reto
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Hasan
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ah yes, of course.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > thx
>> > > > > hasan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > Reto
>> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
>> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Reto
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > hasan
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Tommaso
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would
>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
>> > > > > > to work:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
>> > > > http://example.org/g2");
>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
>> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
>> clerezza.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > > > Reto
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan <ha...@apache.org>.
Hi Reto
Thanks for the information.
I'll take a look this weekend.
Hasan
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent was
> mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built, but
> it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all
> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>
> Dear all
>
> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan
> Kamaci.
> @Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look at
> the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make
> clerezza better.
>
> Cheers
> Hasan
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hasan
> >
> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > >
> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
> > >
> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
> > >
> > > Hasan
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Hasan
> > > >
> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using
> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing
> it.
> > > >
> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
> > > > rdf-commons repo)?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Hasan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ah yes, of course.
> > > > >
> > > > > thx
> > > > > hasan
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hasan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Tommaso
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would
> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
> > > > > > to work:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> > > > http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new
> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented
> clerezza.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@factsmission.com>.
Hi Hasan
I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built, but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all modules depend on the latests released version of the parent.
Cheers,
Reto
-----Original Message-----
From: Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM
To: dev@clerezza.apache.org; Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
Dear all
I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan Kamaci.
@Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make clerezza better.
Cheers
Hasan
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >
> > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
> >
> > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
> >
> > Hasan
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hasan
> > >
> > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using
> > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
> > >
> > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the
> > > rdf-commons repo)?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > >
> > > > Hi Reto
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hasan
> > > > >
> > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the
> > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ah yes, of course.
> > > >
> > > > thx
> > > > hasan
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Reto
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hasan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tommaso
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of
> > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would
> > > > > > > > be nice for code like this
> > > > > to work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
> > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> > > http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Dear all
I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan
Kamaci.
@Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>: could you please take a look at
the reunited branch
and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to make clerezza better.
Cheers
Hasan
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >
> > I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
> >
> > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
> >
> > Hasan
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hasan
> > >
> > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using now
> > > is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
> > >
> > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the rdf-commons
> > > repo)?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > >
> > > > Hi Reto
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hasan
> > > > >
> > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial
> > > > > content to be added to that named graph.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ah yes, of course.
> > > >
> > > > thx
> > > > hasan
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Reto
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hasan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tommaso
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager
> > > > > > > > with DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for
> > > > > > > > code like this
> > > > > to work:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
> > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> > > http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Hasan
I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list.
Cheers,
Reto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan <ha...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>
> I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
>
> I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
> Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
> Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
>
> Hasan
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hasan
> >
> > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using now
> > is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
> >
> > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the rdf-commons
> > repo)?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > >
> > > Hi Reto
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Hasan
> > > >
> > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial
> > > > content to be added to that named graph.
> > > >
> > >
> > > ah yes, of course.
> > >
> > > thx
> > > hasan
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Reto
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > > >
> > > > > hasan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tommaso
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager
> > > > > > > with DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for
> > > > > > > code like this
> > > > to work:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for
> > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> > http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Reto
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan <ha...@apache.org>.
I don't have much time if you can bear with me....
I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master.
Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed.
Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry Reto.
Hasan
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using now is
> not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
>
> Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the rdf-commons
> repo)?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >
> > Hi Reto
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hasan
> > >
> > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial
> > > content to be added to that named graph.
> > >
> >
> > ah yes, of course.
> >
> > thx
> > hasan
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > > >
> > > > Hi Reto
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > > >
> > > > hasan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Tommaso
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager
> > > > > > with DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for code
> > > > > > like this
> > > to work:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> > > > > > TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("
> http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Reto
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Hasan
Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing it.
Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the rdf-commons repo)?
Cheers,
Reto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:xushan.chen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>
> Hi Reto
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hasan
> >
> > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial
> > content to be added to that named graph.
> >
>
> ah yes, of course.
>
> thx
> hasan
>
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> > >
> > > Hi Reto
> > >
> > > Yes, that would be nice.
> > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> > >
> > > hasan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > > <to...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tommaso
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager
> > > > > with DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for code
> > > > > like this
> > to work:
> > > > >
> > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> > > > > TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("http://example.org/g2");
> > > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > > g2).build();
> > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Reto
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan Hasan <xu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Reto
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Hasan
>
> The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial content to
> be added to that named graph.
>
ah yes, of course.
thx
hasan
>
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> > To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
> >
> > Hi Reto
> >
> > Yes, that would be nice.
> > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
> >
> > hasan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > <to...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tommaso
> > >
> > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Hasan,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager with
> > > > DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for code like this
> to work:
> > > >
> > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> > > > TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("http://example.org/g2");
> > > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > > g2).build();
> > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
RE: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi Hasan
The second argument would the graph to be added, or the initial content to be added to that named graph.
Cheers,
Reto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hasan [mailto:hasan@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM
> To: dev@clerezza.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring
>
> Hi Reto
>
> Yes, that would be nice.
> But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
>
> hasan
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Tommaso
> >
> > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Hasan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> > >
> > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager with
> > > DataSet could look like. I think it would be nice for code like this to work:
> > >
> > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> > > TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("http://example.org/g2");
> > > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> > addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > > g2).build();
> > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> > >
> > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
Re: Clerezza refactoring
Posted by Hasan <ha...@apache.org>.
Hi Reto
Yes, that would be nice.
But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ?
hasan
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tommaso
>
> 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <re...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Hasan,
> >
> > Thanks for the good conversation today.
> >
> > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of TcManager with DataSet
> > could look like. I think it would be nice for code like this to work:
> >
> > Graph g = new SimpleGraph();
> > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for add(new
> > TripleImpl(s,p,o));
> > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI("http://example.org/g2");
> > DataSet ds = new DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g).
> addNamedGraph(graphName,
> > g2).build();
> > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ....");
> >
> > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented clerezza.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> >
> >
>