You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-user@james.apache.org by Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp> on 2001/08/09 14:05:26 UTC
What JAMES version recommended?
Hi.
Im new to JAMES. What version of JAMES is recommended?
Release Builds(1.2.1) or Nightly Build or CVS Version?
i want to use JAMES for production.
thanks.
--
Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: What JAMES version recommended?
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Nothing's been done on the maildir front that I know of. IMAP has made
some, but is still very much alpha code. I think the main developer of that
code has been busy lately and is looking for help.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craeg K. Strong" <cs...@arielpartners.com>
To: <ja...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: What JAMES version recommended?
> >
> >
> >Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation.
The
> >nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't
changing
> >significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and be
> >relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to
figure
> >a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
> >
> >Serge Knystautas
> >
> We have been up and running on the 1.2.1 release for several months with
> few problems.
> The SMTP and POP modules work very well.
>
> Incidentally, does anyone know the status of IMAP and maildir support?
>
> --Craeg Strong
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: What JAMES version recommended?
Posted by "Craeg K. Strong" <cs...@arielpartners.com>.
>
>
>Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation. The
>nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't changing
>significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and be
>relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to figure
>a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
>
>Serge Knystautas
>
We have been up and running on the 1.2.1 release for several months with
few problems.
The SMTP and POP modules work very well.
Incidentally, does anyone know the status of IMAP and maildir support?
--Craeg Strong
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: What JAMES version recommended?
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
'kill' aborts any transfer, but the sending mail server will treat this as a
temporary condition and retry since it would not receive a confirmation of
receipt notice.
The next version does not have a more graceful shutdown method, although I'm
pushing to get the next version released this month. Like I said, mail
won't get lost or corrupted by a 'kill', so it hasn't been a high priority.
It is more of a priority though so we can gracefully restart without having
to stop and start the process.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Takashi Kawachi" <ka...@netage.co.jp>
To: <ja...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: What JAMES version recommended?
> I'm trying james 1.2.1. It can be considered to be enough for me if
> james' shutdown is done safely (without lost any incoming mail).
> I shutdown james by kill command,and i think it's not safety. Is my
> idea right?
>
> I read mailing list archive that next version of james has a method of
> safety shutdown. I want to know when it's released?
>
> thanks.
>
> At Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:39:38 -0400,
> Serge Knystautas wrote:
> > Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation.
The
> > nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't
changing
> > significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and
be
> > relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to
figure
> > a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
> >
> > Serge Knystautas
> > Loki Technologies
> > http://www.lokitech.com/
>
> --
> Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: What JAMES version recommended?
Posted by Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp>.
I'm trying james 1.2.1. It can be considered to be enough for me if
james' shutdown is done safely (without lost any incoming mail).
I shutdown james by kill command,and i think it's not safety. Is my
idea right?
I read mailing list archive that next version of james has a method of
safety shutdown. I want to know when it's released?
thanks.
At Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:39:38 -0400,
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation. The
> nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't changing
> significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and be
> relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to figure
> a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
>
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
--
Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: What JAMES version recommended?
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Depends how comfortable you are testing and tweaking an installation. The
nightly builds are just whatever is in CVS that night, which isn't changing
significantly at this point. If you want something that will work and be
relatively straight forward, use 1.2.1. If you feel up to having to figure
a lot more out, you can try the nightly build/CVS version.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Takashi Kawachi" <ka...@netage.co.jp>
To: <ja...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:05 AM
Subject: What JAMES version recommended?
> Hi.
> Im new to JAMES. What version of JAMES is recommended?
> Release Builds(1.2.1) or Nightly Build or CVS Version?
> i want to use JAMES for production.
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> Takashi Kawachi <ka...@netage.co.jp>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-user-help@jakarta.apache.org